{
  "round1_critique": {
    "boundary_violation_detected": false,
    "hallucination_risk_detected": false,
    "missing_assumption_detected": false,
    "overreach_detected": false,
    "operator_constraints_respected": true
  },
  "round2_verdict": "round1_supported_with_corrections",
  "findings": [
    {
      "category": "extraction",
      "description": "Entity extraction from prompt-draft rows frequently captures short action phrases, stage directions, or adverbial fragments rather than core narrative entities (e.g., '一手扶丰儿', '倒酒', '低声细'). This inflates the blocked-for-review count to 884/912 and may hinder the registry's practical utility for entity linking.",
      "required_fix": "Tighten extraction logic to distinguish content-bearing entities from transient linguistic fragments. Consider filtering out items below a minimum semantic weight or those that are solely meta-instructions.",
      "severity": "medium"
    },
    {
      "category": "extraction",
      "description": "Type/subtype classification relies heavily on LLM advisory with limited validation, resulting in 185 candidates marked 'type_subtype_uncertain' and a large '其他' category. This increases manual review burden and may propagate misclassifications downstream.",
      "required_fix": "Improve the LLM prompt with explicit examples and enforce stricter mapping to the allowed ontology. For ambiguous cases, default to '其他' but flag for review, and consider a secondary human-in-the-loop refinement pass before the registry is considered authority-satisfying.",
      "severity": "low"
    },
    {
      "category": "source_authority",
      "description": "Many blocked candidates have only a single P2V-22 draft row as source evidence, which is marked as 'insufficient_source_evidence'. While the contract permits draft rows as evidence, the extraction does not always verify whether the entity originates from the underlying novel text, weakening the 'source-grounded' claim for low-evidence items.",
      "required_fix": "Add an optional cross-reference step against the original novel text or P2V-17 chapter rows to boost evidence confidence for critical entities. Retain the blocked status unless such corroboration is obtainable.",
      "severity": "low"
    }
  ],
  "required_corrections": [
    "Refine entity extraction criteria to reduce non-entity phrase collection.",
    "Enhance LLM type/subtype classification with stricter guidelines and validation.",
    "Optionally cross-check low-evidence candidates against original source or P2V-17 rows."
  ],
  "confidence": "medium",
  "final_recommendation": "The registry candidate build respects boundaries and operator constraints, and Round 1's design audit remains sound. However, the high volume of blocked candidates and extraction quality issues warrant corrective actions before advancing to UID binding or downstream use. Proceed with refinements, but do not block the overall registry build pipeline."
}