{
  "parse_status": "pass",
  "confidence": "high",
  "eligibility_reconciliation_boundary_supported": true,
  "no_canonical_writeback_authority_supported": true,
  "zero_intersection_handling_supported": true,
  "overall_verdict": "supports_with_required_corrections",
  "recommended_disposition": "land_after_corrections",
  "findings": [
    {
      "category": "validation",
      "description": "The validator’s explicit reporting list omits several forbidden side-effect categories (e.g., asset_binding, provider_jobs, repair) that appear in the intake gate and are covered only by a generic non‑zero check. Explicit inclusion would eliminate ambiguity and strengthen enforcement.",
      "required_fix": "Expand the required explicit report to include all forbidden side-effect counts listed in the intake gate’s forbidden_side_effect_counts, or require the validator to emit the full forbidden_side_effect_counts block.",
      "severity": "medium"
    },
    {
      "category": "control_plane",
      "description": "The validator checks only execution_state.json.next_entrypoint, but the exit criteria require that ‘control‑plane short‑entry files record the next implementation as no‑writeback eligibility reconciliation’. Without a validator for phase_acceptance.json, workflow.json, workflow_index.json, and retrospective_state.json, the contract’s own exit condition cannot be mechanically verified.",
      "required_fix": "Add a validator that inspects the relevant control‑plane files (phase_acceptance.json, workflow.json, workflow_index.json, retrospective_state.json) and confirms they classify the next step as no‑writeback eligibility reconciliation and do not claim canonical writeback authority or production acceptance.",
      "severity": "medium"
    },
    {
      "category": "boundary",
      "description": "Artifact names (e.g., REAL_UID_WRITEBACK_execution_input.json) could be misread as authorizing writeback, despite the contract text stating they are no‑writeback eligibility artifacts.",
      "required_fix": "Either rename artifacts to clearly denote eligibility (e.g., REAL_UID_WRITEBACK_ELIGIBILITY_…) or add a mandatory metadata field in each artifact and the gate that explicitly states it is a no‑writeback eligibility record.",
      "severity": "low"
    }
  ],
  "required_corrections": [
    "Expand the validator’s explicit report to include all forbidden side-effect counts (asset_binding, provider_jobs, repair, etc.) as listed in the intake gate, or require the validator to emit the full forbidden_side_effect_counts block.",
    "Add a validator that inspects phase_acceptance.json, workflow.json, workflow_index.json, and retrospective_state.json to confirm they classify the next step as no‑writeback eligibility reconciliation and do not assert writeback authority or production acceptance.",
    "Either rename eligibility artifacts (e.g., REAL_UID_WRITEBACK_ELIGIBILITY_…) or embed a mandatory metadata disclaimer in each artifact and the gate confirming they are no‑writeback records."
  ]
}