{ "parse_status": "pass", "overall_verdict": "The project has successfully completed the P计划 V2 pipeline rebuild and Now-32 control-plane hardening, establishing a traceable, governed readiness pipeline. The durable advantage lies in the production graph—entity links, asset binding, shot-level traceability—not one‑off prose generation. The mainline must now progress toward entity‑linked, asset‑bound, industry‑aligned production packets, with explicit operator activation contracts required for each step. The 240 held rows and chapter‑18 readiness debt remain blockers to any production acceptance claim. DeepSeek advisory remains a powerful, non‑voting consultant and must never become evidence or authority.", "project_goal_alignment": [ "P计划 V2 rebuilt the pipeline from source constraints through neutral prompt readiness, achieving traceability, packaging, and debt registration—directly serving the program‑first goal up to the 'provider‑neutral prompt packet' stage.", "Now‑32 control‑plane hardening defined evidence taxonomy and a manual execution log contract, reinforcing the required separation of advisory, readiness, evidence, acceptance, and execution layers.", "The pipeline now holds 1638 neutral draft rows with readiness labels, ready for the next phases of entity‑/asset‑binding and industry schema alignment, exactly as targeted by the project goal.", "Remaining work (entity linking, asset binding, industry benchmark integration, reviewer harness, evidence pack assembly) maps directly to the 'source → KG → entity/context → … → provider‑neutral prompt packet / adapter payload → review/handoff' chain.", "Providers are correctly treated as adapter/benchmark/feedback targets; no provider‑specific schema has been allowed to corrupt the canonical neutral packets." ], "actual_landed_work": [ "P计划 V2 closed after P2V24 final closeout: 20 chapter packages, 1638 neutral draft rows, 240 held rows, 247 debt rows, deterministic validators, traceability summary, readiness debt register, Now‑32 handoff calibration, final review HTML, focused tests (3 passed).", "Now‑32 control‑plane hardening contract landed and validated: evidence taxonomy (advisory/template/manual/provider/operator/pending), manual execution log contract schema with template‑only rules, held‑entity invariant, allowed/blocked transition policies, preflight checks, and dry‑run verification commands.", "Two‑round DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max advisory protocol executed for Now‑32 hardening; Round 1 parse repair applied transparently; Round 2 critique returned pass/high confidence.", "DeepSeek advisory records created as advisory‑only, with full provider/model/thinking metadata, input fingerprints, raw responses, and parse status.", "Control‑plane files synchronized: now32_control_plane_hardening_status, evidence taxonomy status, manual execution log contract status, held‑entity invariant, pre‑execution gate status.", "P2V24 final report and Now‑32 hardening contract both confirm zero forbidden side‑effect counts and unchanged execution_state.json.next_entrypoint." ], "not_landed_or_blocked": [ "Provider‑specific prompt rendering, adapter payload creation, provider dispatch, media generation.", "Filled manual/provider/operator evidence entries, operator production acceptance, evidence manifests with live data.", "Feedback intake, repair execution, replay actions, accepted/operator overlay writeback, canonical/raw KG writeback, outputs index mutation.", "Resolution of the 240 held rows and chapter‑18 readiness debt (requires explicit repair/QA contract).", "Activation of any candidate mainline Now‑33, Now‑34, Now‑35, or Now‑36.", "Runtime branching by work title, entity name, character name, block title, or sample text.", "Any claim of production readiness or evidence‑backed execution." ], "retrospective_findings": [ "The P计划 V2 rebuild successfully transformed the pipeline from an ad‑hoc creative‑quality prototype into a traceable, packageable, and reviewable production‑oriented system, proving the program‑first approach.", "The layered governance model (advisory/readiness/evidence/acceptance/execution) is now structurally enforced via contracts, policy flags, and control‑plane fields, significantly reducing the risk of accidental authority leakage.", "The pipeline’s durable value lies in its ability to produce a stable production graph—KG/entity links, asset references, shot‑level binding—rather than competing on one‑off literary script quality with direct LLM generation.", "Now‑32 hardening has established a rigorous evidence boundary, but real manual/provider evidence remains hypothetical until an explicit execution contract authorizes it; the manual execution log contract is defined but untested with live data.", "The 240 held rows and chapter‑18 held‑only status constitute visible, registered readiness debt that must be transparently addressed before any production acceptance or evidence pack assembly.", "The candidate mainlines Now‑33..36 provide a logical, gated technical progression that aligns with industry benchmarks (Seedance, 微光巢穴) and reinforces the production‑graph advantage; their sequential activation, controlled by operator contracts, preserves control‑plane integrity.", "DeepSeek advisory protocol has demonstrated high‑quality, dialectical guidance for governance decisions without contaminating evidence, acceptance, or production layers—a pattern worth extending as a formal review harness (Now‑35).", "The project’s current fragility centers on the unresolved held‑row debt and the absence of any end‑to‑end evidence flow; until a repair contract and at least one manual evidence exercise are completed, production readiness cannot be demonstrated." ], "risks_and_debt": [ "240 held rows and chapter‑18 readiness debt persist; if not resolved via an explicit repair/QA contract before or during Now‑33/34, they will block production acceptance and erode trust in the readiness labels.", "Manual execution log contract remains schematic; without at least one authorized manual evidence exercise, latent design gaps (e.g., chain‑of‑custody recording, operator authentication) cannot be validated.", "Entity‑link and asset‑binding work (Now‑33) may introduce schema complexity that conflicts with existing neutral prompt packets; careful migration rules and backward‑compatibility validation are required.", "Industry‑benchmark schema upgrade (Now‑34) risks creeping aesthetic or subjective judgment into hard validator gates; structural checks must be the only hard failures, with stylistic advisories kept separate.", "DeepSeek reviewer integration (Now‑35) could be misinterpreted as a substitute for human acceptance if its advisory‑only nature is not rigorously enforced; automated acceptance or rejection by DeepSeek scores must remain forbidden.", "Activation contracts that skip prerequisites (e.g., starting Now‑34 without completing Now‑33) could create fragmented artifacts and hidden debt; the recommended sequence must be respected.", "The pipeline is a single‑developer, file‑based prototype; production scaling, multi‑user access, and secure key management for provider adapters are not yet addressed and may require a dedicated infrastructure hardening phase." ], "mainline_recalibration": [ "Reaffirm the program‑first project goal: future work must optimize for entity‑linked, asset‑bound, traceable production packets—not for literary script quality alone. Industry benchmarks (Seedance, 微光巢穴) confirm the value of structured control packets with subject, action, camera language, reference assets, sound, and restrictions.", "Adopt the candidate mainline sequence Now‑33 → Now‑34 → Now‑35 → Now‑36 as the primary technical progression, with each step gated by an explicit operator activation contract that defines scope, allowed mutations, and evidence boundaries.", "Introduce a prerequisite 'Now‑32 Repair and Debt Clearance Contract' (or a parallel repair track) to address the 240 held rows and chapter‑18 readiness before production evidence pack assembly (Now‑36). This contract must define QA criteria, repair authorization limits, and evidence logging for any status promotions.", "Strengthen Mainline 6 (Feedback, Repair, Replay) by ensuring that after Now‑36, future contracts explicitly close the loop: provider execution → evidence intake → automated review (including DeepSeek) → repair/replay actions, with all loops maintaining traceable provenance.", "Maintain the two‑round DeepSeek consultant protocol for all high‑impact strategy, quality gate, schema design, and route transition decisions; record every consultation as an advisory‑only artifact.", "Keep execution_state.json.next_entrypoint unchanged; any route transition (e.g., from Now‑32 to Now‑33) must be authorized by an explicit transition contract that verifies prerequisite completion and control‑plane invariants.", "Continue to treat provider‑specific formats as adapter targets, not canonical schema owners; the provider‑neutral prompt packet must remain the source of truth and the foundation for all adapter payload rendering.", "Schedule a post‑Now‑36 infrastructure audit to assess production scaling, access control, and secure credential management for provider adapters; this may become a future Now‑37 or separate infrastructure stream." ], "recommended_sequence": [ { "id": "now32_retrospective_and_recalibration_consolidation", "status": "active_after_advisory", "why": "Record the full retrospective and mainline recalibration as an advisory control‑plane artifact; update retrospective_state.json and workflow index without changing active route authority or execution state.", "activation_boundary": "This advisory itself (returned JSON) must be recorded by the operator as a control‑plane document; no automated state mutation is authorized.", "required_artifacts_or_contracts": [ "This retrospective JSON (to be stored as an advisory artifact)", "Updated retrospective_state.json to reference the recalibration", "Updated workflow_index.json entry noting retrospective completion (advisory)", "Validation that execution_state.json.next_entrypoint remains unchanged" ] }, { "id": "now32_repair_and_debt_clearance_contract", "status": "recommended_candidate", "why": "240 held rows and chapter‑18 readiness debt directly block production acceptance. An explicit repair/QA contract is needed to authorize triage, repair criteria, and evidence‑backed promotion of held rows to ready status where appropriate.", "activation_boundary": "Operator issues an explicit Now‑32 Repair Contract defining allowed repair actions, QA gates, evidence log schema, and the maximum promotion that can occur. No automatic promotion is allowed; every change must be evidence‑gated.", "required_artifacts_or_contracts": [ "Repair contract definition (scope, repair categories, QA rubrics)", "Held‑row repair evidence log schema (manual/operator evidence entries)", "Chapter‑18 readiness triage plan", "Integration with Now‑32 manual execution log contract for any manual repair evidence", "Policy: repair evidence is advisory‑gated but does not constitute production acceptance" ] }, { "id": "now33_kg_entity_link_and_asset_binding", "status": "candidate_blocked_until_explicit_contract", "why": "Strengthens the production graph by binding neutral prompt rows to stable KG entities and reference assets, turning every shot into a traceable, asset‑linked production packet—directly serving the project goal.", "activation_boundary": "Operator issues an explicit Now‑33 activation contract authorizing entity‑link and asset‑binding work. Canonical KG writeback remains blocked unless separately authorized; the contract must distinguish between read‑only linking and writeback.", "required_artifacts_or_contracts": [ "Entity‑link manifest schema and linkage rules", "Asset binding registry design with reference criteria", "Disambiguation strategy for ambiguous entities", "Migration plan for augmenting existing 1638 prompt rows with entity/asset refs (read‑only or overlay only)", "Validation that no canonical KG is mutated without explicit KG writeback contract" ] }, { "id": "now34_industry_benchmark_schema_and_gate_upgrade", "status": "candidate_blocked_until_explicit_contract", "why": "Translates industry resource constraints (Seedance, 微光巢穴, Dramart) into formal schema, validator, and QA rubric, aligning the pipeline’s prompt packets with real‑world production packet expectations.", "activation_boundary": "Operator issues an explicit Now‑34 activation contract after Now‑33 is complete or an explicit decision to skip Now‑33 is recorded. The contract must forbid aesthetic judgments as hard gate failures.", "required_artifacts_or_contracts": [ "VideoPromptPacket schema v2 (incorporating subject, action, camera language, reference assets, style, audio, restrictions)", "Validator specifications and adversarial benchmark examples", "Migration rules for approved rows to the new schema (non‑destructive read‑only application until acceptance)", "Policy: hard failures only for structural violations; aesthetic/stylistic findings are advisory" ] }, { "id": "now35_deepseek_consultant_as_reviewer", "status": "candidate_blocked_until_explicit_contract", "why": "Operationalizes DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max as a systematic, non‑voting reviewer for prompt readiness, entity consistency, asset binding, and industry compliance—providing high‑quality dialectical feedback without granting acceptance authority.", "activation_boundary": "Operator issues an explicit Now‑35 activation contract, likely after Now‑34 or a decision that the review harness can be built in parallel. The contract must enforce advisory‑only status and forbid score‑based auto‑acceptance.", "required_artifacts_or_contracts": [ "Review harness architecture and integration points", "Scoring dimensions, calibration methodology, and inter‑rater comparison framework", "Advisory log schema and review dashboard design", "Policy: DeepSeek scores are advisory; they must never auto‑accept, auto‑reject, or mutate canonical data" ] }, { "id": "now36_production_readiness_evidence_pack", "status": "candidate_blocked_until_explicit_contract", "why": "Assembles a self‑contained pre‑execution evidence pack that proves readiness for provider dispatch, disclosing all remaining debt and missing assets—the final governance gate before any provider execution.", "activation_boundary": "Operator issues an explicit Now‑36 activation contract. Prerequisites: Now‑32 repair contract resolved most held/debt rows; Now‑33 and Now‑34 substantially complete; Now‑35 harness available for review. The evidence pack does not itself authorize execution.", "required_artifacts_or_contracts": [ "Evidence pack structure and manifest schema", "Mandatory gap analysis fields for held rows, missing assets, unresolved debts, and non‑ready chapters", "Operator signature validity criteria and chain‑of‑custody rules", "Integration with downstream deliverable format references (e.g., Dramart) as non‑execution formatting constraints only", "Policy: assembly of the pack is not production acceptance; a separate operator acceptance step is required after review" ] } ], "control_plane_update_recommendations": [ "Record this full retrospective JSON as an advisory control‑plane artifact (e.g., outputs/retrospective_post_now32_round1_20260606.json) without mutating execution_state.json.next_entrypoint.", "Update retrospective_state.json to reflect that the retrospective and mainline recalibration have been completed in advisory mode, with a reference to the artifact and the recommended sequence.", "Add a brief entry to workflow_index.json or patchnote.md documenting the retrospective’s completion and the recommended mainline recalibration, flagged as advisory‑only.", "Synchronize any short‑entry control‑plane fields (e.g., now32_retrospective_status) to point to this advisory, but keep all policy flags for provider execution and evidence false.", "Run the prescribed verification commands (json‑tool, workflow_guard, pytest) to confirm that no forbidden state change has occurred as a side effect of recording the retrospective.", "Do not create any new active route entry, execution state transition, or acceptance gate based on this retrospective; it remains strictly advisory." ], "do_not_do": [ "Do not activate Now‑33, Now‑34, Now‑35, Now‑36, or any repair contract from this advisory alone; explicit operator activation contracts are mandatory.", "Do not change execution_state.json.next_entrypoint or the active route authority.", "Do not generate provider‑specific prompts, adapter payloads, provider jobs, media, or any filled evidence entries.", "Do not treat DeepSeek output as provider evidence, operator acceptance, KG/overlay writeback, or outputs index authority.", "Do not hardcode chapter titles, entity names, character names, or sample text in any control‑plane logic, validator, or gate.", "Do not claim production readiness, operator acceptance, or evidence completeness while 240 held rows and chapter‑18 readiness debt remain unresolved.", "Do not mutate outputs/index.json, outputs/index‑lite.json, or any canonical KG without an explicit, separate writeback contract." ], "confidence": "high" }