{
  "version": "post_now33_code_level_recalibration_deepseek.v1",
  "created_at": "2026-06-07T11:12:36.464950Z",
  "round_id": "round2",
  "call_status": "success",
  "parse_status": "pass",
  "parse_error": "",
  "confidence": "high",
  "finding_counts": {
    "medium": 1,
    "low": 2
  },
  "findings": [
    {
      "category": "control_plane",
      "description": "Post-slimming verification must explicitly confirm that all data structures required by workflow_guard (e.g., classification rules in workflow_index.json) remain intact and functional.",
      "required_fix": "Extend post_slimming_verification_required to include a structural check that the workflow_guard can parse and classify all workflows without error and that its pass/warn/fail counts remain consistent with the pre-slimming state.",
      "severity": "medium"
    },
    {
      "category": "strategy",
      "description": "The expected row counts (draft, held, readiness debt) in proposed_detail_rules.input_invariants are static and could drift from the actual state at contract execution time.",
      "required_fix": "Implement a runtime check that re-derives these counts from the authoritative registers (P2V-24, NOW-32 sidecars) before accepting them as invariants, rather than relying solely on the static values.",
      "severity": "low"
    },
    {
      "category": "boundary",
      "description": "The deepseek_rules setting 'missing_skipped_timeout_or_parse_failed_blocks_pass: true' makes advisory consultation effectively optional for gate passage; this should be explicitly noted as intentional to avoid later misinterpretation.",
      "required_fix": "Add a comment in the contract or gate documentation clarifying that the gate can succeed without DeepSeek input if the call fails, and that operator acceptance remains the sole authority.",
      "severity": "low"
    }
  ],
  "required_corrections": [
    "Verify workflow_guard structural integrity after slimming by re-running the guard and confirming no regressions in classification, pass/warn/fail counts, or gate status.",
    "Replace static expected row counts in input_invariants with runtime lookups to authoritative registers to prevent drift.",
    "Document that gate passage does not require a successful DeepSeek call; the system treats unavailable/skipped advisory as a non-blocking event."
  ],
  "raw_payload": {
    "boundary_violation_detected": false,
    "confidence": "high",
    "final_recommendation": "Proceed with control-plane slimming and next-contract design as proposed, with the minor corrections and verifications listed.",
    "findings": [
      {
        "category": "control_plane",
        "description": "Post-slimming verification must explicitly confirm that all data structures required by workflow_guard (e.g., classification rules in workflow_index.json) remain intact and functional.",
        "required_fix": "Extend post_slimming_verification_required to include a structural check that the workflow_guard can parse and classify all workflows without error and that its pass/warn/fail counts remain consistent with the pre-slimming state.",
        "severity": "medium"
      },
      {
        "category": "strategy",
        "description": "The expected row counts (draft, held, readiness debt) in proposed_detail_rules.input_invariants are static and could drift from the actual state at contract execution time.",
        "required_fix": "Implement a runtime check that re-derives these counts from the authoritative registers (P2V-24, NOW-32 sidecars) before accepting them as invariants, rather than relying solely on the static values.",
        "severity": "low"
      },
      {
        "category": "boundary",
        "description": "The deepseek_rules setting 'missing_skipped_timeout_or_parse_failed_blocks_pass: true' makes advisory consultation effectively optional for gate passage; this should be explicitly noted as intentional to avoid later misinterpretation.",
        "required_fix": "Add a comment in the contract or gate documentation clarifying that the gate can succeed without DeepSeek input if the call fails, and that operator acceptance remains the sole authority.",
        "severity": "low"
      }
    ],
    "operator_constraints_respected": true,
    "overreach_detected": false,
    "parse_status": "pass",
    "required_corrections": [
      "Verify workflow_guard structural integrity after slimming by re-running the guard and confirming no regressions in classification, pass/warn/fail counts, or gate status.",
      "Replace static expected row counts in input_invariants with runtime lookups to authoritative registers to prevent drift.",
      "Document that gate passage does not require a successful DeepSeek call; the system treats unavailable/skipped advisory as a non-blocking event."
    ],
    "round2_verdict": "round1_supported_with_corrections"
  },
  "advisory_only": true,
  "not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority": true,
  "overall_verdict": "",
  "round2_verdict": "round1_supported_with_corrections",
  "overreach_detected": false,
  "boundary_violation_detected": false,
  "operator_constraints_respected": true,
  "final_recommendation": "Proceed with control-plane slimming and next-contract design as proposed, with the minor corrections and verifications listed."
}