{ "confidence": "high", "final_recommendation": "Fix guard to enforce mandatory fingerprint block per contract and remove deepseek advisory dependency; re-issue round1 advisory with corrected scope.", "findings": [ { "category": "boundary", "description": "Guard gate blocks on pending deepseek advisory, but contract defines advisory as advisory-only and does not require it to pass. This overreaches the contract.", "required_fix": "Remove deepseek advisory pass dependency from guard gate criteria; treat failures as warnings only.", "severity": "high" }, { "category": "boundary", "description": "Guard gate does not block when target_source_fingerprint is absent from NOW-33 reference rerun gate, contrary to mandatory block rule in contract. It only warns instead of blocking.", "required_fix": "Add block condition for missing target_source_fingerprint in any required gate as per consumption guard rules; reject inference as sufficient to pass.", "severity": "blocker" }, { "category": "fingerprint", "description": "Round1 advisory incorrectly recommends accepting fingerprint inference as a valid warning linkage and not blocking, missing the contract's must-block requirement.", "required_fix": "Correct round1 recommendation to enforce mandatory block when fingerprint is absent from any required gate.", "severity": "high" } ], "required_fixes": [ "Remove deepseek advisory dependency from guard gate block criteria; log failures as warnings only.", "Enforce block when target_source_fingerprint is absent from NOW-33 rerun gate as required by consumption guard rules; do not accept inference as sufficient.", "Update round1 advisory to reflect mandatory fingerprint block requirement." ], "round1_critique": { "boundary_violation_detected": true, "fingerprint_inference_handled_honestly": true, "hallucination_risk_detected": false, "missing_assumption_detected": true, "operator_constraints_respected": true, "overreach_detected": true }, "round2_verdict": "round1_needs_fix" }