{
  "version": "now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_deepseek_consultation.v1",
  "created_at": "2026-06-07T07:39:58.996713Z",
  "call_status": "success",
  "provider_meta": {
    "provider": "deepseek_reviewer",
    "model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
    "base_url": "https://api.deepseek.com/chat/completions",
    "thinking_type": "enabled",
    "reasoning_effort": "max",
    "max_tokens": 32000,
    "timeout_seconds": 600,
    "temperature": 0.0,
    "skipped": false
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "system",
      "content": "You are an independent pipeline boundary auditor. Return compact JSON only. Advisory-only."
    },
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "{\"active_route\": {\"execution_state_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/execution_state.json\", \"sha256\": \"5432a7e0256dbc1b4a8f8a9659d63395b361c68feae9cfb3d27ac2c4734424b7\", \"size_bytes\": 82528}, \"next_entrypoint_id\": \"platform_neutral_prompt_readiness_manual_execution_log_contract\"}, \"advisory_question\": \"Round 1: audit whether a future program rerun of the NOW-33 candidate consumption guard can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and later paired with a successful Round 2 record. Do not treat the absence of Round 2 during Round 1 as a defect or high finding; it is the expected next process step.\", \"consultation_process_boundary\": {\"current_source_guard_packet_may_show_pending_deepseek\": true, \"deepseek_must_audit_whether_a_future_program_rerun_with_these_records_can_close_no_writeback\": true, \"deepseek_must_not_claim_its_single_round_directly_changes_gate_pass\": true, \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\": true, \"round1_may_state_round2_is_next_process_step_without_classifying_it_as_a_problem\": true, \"round1_must_not_mark_the_absence_of_round2_as_a_defect_or_high_finding\": true, \"round1_occurs_before_round2_by_design\": true, \"this_consultation_cannot_mutate_or_reclassify_the_source_guard_gate\": true, \"this_consultation_record_must_be_written_first_then_passed_into_a_fresh_guard_rerun\": true}, \"contract_excerpt\": {\"char_count\": 17282, \"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/docs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_contract_20260607.md\", \"sha256\": \"b1ed73c869e27fb8ed3fe22e3cd85ec61af62bcf25dce745f86dffd7366edbf2\", \"text\": \"# NOW-33 Reference Candidate Consumption Guard And Registry Content Review Contract\\n\\n更新时间：`2026-06-07T14:40:40+08:00`\\n\\n## Status\\n\\n- contract id: `now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_contract`\\n- status: `contract_landed_pending_implementation`\\n- active route authority: `execution_state.json.next_entrypoint`\\n- active route remains: `platform_neutral_prompt_readiness_manual_execution_log_contract`\\n- source retrospective: `docs/now33_reference_registry_rerun_retrospective_20260607.md`\\n- source NOW-33 rerun: `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049`\\n- source registry build: `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032`\\n- source built-candidate preflight: `outputs/current_registry_authority_preflight_for_built_candidate_20260607_0034`\\n- DeepSeek v4 pro Round 1: `outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_contract_deepseek_pro_consultation_20260607_143239`\\n- DeepSeek v4 pro Round 2: `outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_contract_deepseek_pro_consultation_round2_20260607_143656`\\n- superseded non-pro advisory record: `outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_contract_deepseek_consultation_20260607_143046`\\n\\n## Purpose\\n\\nNOW-33 reference-registry rerun produced `1476` exact-surface `candidate_entity_refs` across `1056` of `1638` prompt draft rows. These refs are useful review signals, but they are not canonical bindings.\\n\\nThis contract defines the next implementation step before any canonical UID binding, KG/raw KG/entity-store writeback, row mutation, asset binding, evidence pack, route transition, or production acceptance:\\n\\n1. Build deterministic consumption guards so downstream code cannot treat `candidate_entity_refs` as `canonical_entity_uids`.\\n2. Build a registry content review packet for the `28` unblocked registry entities and the `1476` candidate refs.\\n3. Produce review/gap/risk artifacts that prepare, but do not execute, a future canonical UID binding acceptance/writeback contract.\\n\\n## Inputs\\n\\nRequired read-only inputs:\\n\\n- `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_gate.json`\\n- `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json`\\n- `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_source_entity_candidate_manifest.jsonl`\\n- `outputs/current_registry_authority_preflight_for_built_candidate_20260607_0034/NOW_33A_current_registry_gate.json`\\n- `outputs/current_registry_authority_preflight_for_built_candidate_20260607_0034/NOW_33A_registry_candidate_manifest.jsonl`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_entity_link_gate.json`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_entity_link_advisory_manifest.jsonl`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_entity_gap_report.json`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_registry_discovery_report.json`\\n- DeepSeek final advisory refs for registry build and NOW-33 rerun.\\n\\nAll inputs remain source artifacts only. Reading these inputs does not create acceptance, evidence, canonical authority, or writeback authority.\\n\\n## Allowed Work\\n\\nImplementation may:\\n\\n- Parse and validate the required input gates/manifests.\\n- Verify that the configured registry path, selected preflight path, and NOW-33 registry discovery path match.\\n- Verify SHA-256 integrity for all required input artifacts recorded in the implementation input manifest before processing.\\n- Verify that `target_source_fingerprint` exists and matches across the target registry build gate, built-candidate preflight gate, and NOW-33 reference rerun gate.\\n- Verify that every NOW-33 row with candidate refs includes `candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings=true` and `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=false`.\\n- Verify that every candidate ref object is structurally valid before review queue generation.\\n- Verify that every referenced candidate comes from a registry entity with `blocked_for_review=false`.\\n- Verify row-level candidate-ref count consistency between declared row counts and actual candidate ref arrays.\\n- Build a candidate-ref consumption guard report with pass/block findings.\\n- Build a registry content review queue covering the `28` unblocked registry entities.\\n- Build a candidate-ref review queue covering the `1476` candidate refs, grouped by entity UID, surface, draft row, chapter, scene, and shot.\\n- Flag likely false positives, missing high-value surfaces, blocked-entity leakage, alias/surface collisions, duplicate-surface risks, weak support, and type/subtype uncertainty.\\n- Generate side-effect-free JSON/JSONL/HTML artifacts under a new output run.\\n- Run two DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max advisory rounds over the contract and output packet if the implementation asserts closeout/readiness.\\n\\n## Forbidden Work\\n\\nThis contract does not authorize:\\n\\n- canonical UID binding acceptance or writeback;\\n- KG/raw KG/entity-store writeback;\\n- accepted/operator overlay writeback;\\n- draft, held, readiness, execution-log, or prompt-row mutation;\\n- held-row promotion, waiver, or repair execution;\\n- asset generation, acquisition, or binding;\\n- provider-specific prompt generation, adapter payload generation, provider job execution, or media generation;\\n- manual/provider/operator evidence creation;\\n- feedback intake, repair, replay, or replay eligibility;\\n- route transition or `execution_state.json.next_entrypoint` change;\\n- `outputs/index.json` or `outputs/index-lite.json` mutation;\\n- production readiness or production acceptance.\\n\\nDeepSeek advisory remains advisory-only and cannot become evidence, operator acceptance, canonical state, writeback authority, route authority, or output-index authority.\\n\\n## Required Output Artifacts\\n\\nThe implementation should create a new output run, for example:\\n\\n`outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_<timestamp>`\\n\\nRequired artifacts:\\n\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_input.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_registry_content_review_queue.jsonl`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_ref_review_queue.jsonl`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_surface_collision_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_missing_high_value_surface_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_review_summary.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_validation_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_review.html`\\n- `manifest.json`\\n\\nIf DeepSeek consultation is run for implementation closeout, store consultation inputs/messages/raw/parsed/record files in dedicated output directories and reference them from the gate. These records are review aids only and must never be used as provider/manual/operator evidence, accepted overlay, canonical facts, route authority, or output-index authority.\\n\\n## Required Output Schemas\\n\\n`manifest.json` must include at minimum:\\n\\n- `version`\\n- `created_at`\\n- `run_id`\\n- `stage`\\n- `status`\\n- `input_artifacts` with `path`, `sha256`, and `size_bytes`\\n- `output_artifacts` with `path`, `sha256`, `size_bytes`, and `artifact_role`\\n- `deepseek_advisory_refs`\\n- `forbidden_side_effect_counts`\\n- `advisory_only=true`\\n- `not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority=true`\\n\\n`NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.json` must include at minimum:\\n\\n- `version`\\n- `created_at`\\n- `status`\\n- `pass`\\n- `block_reasons`\\n- `warnings`\\n- `input_integrity`\\n- `source_fingerprint_check`\\n- `registry_path_check`\\n- `candidate_ref_structural_check`\\n- `candidate_ref_count_check`\\n- `non_binding_flag_check`\\n- `blocked_registry_leak_check`\\n- `canonical_uid_writeback_check`\\n- `output_forbidden_claim_scan`\\n- `review_queue_coverage`\\n- `deepseek_advisory_status`\\n- `forbidden_side_effect_counts`\\n- `next_entrypoint_unchanged`\\n- `advisory_only=true`\\n- `not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority=true`\\n\\n## Consumption Guard Rules\\n\\nThe guard must block if any of the following are true:\\n\\n- `execution_state.json.next_entrypoint` changed.\\n- NOW-33 rerun gate is not `advisory_entity_link_binding_closed_reference_registry_no_writeback`.\\n- NOW-33 rerun gate has `canonical_entity_uid_bound_count != 0`.\\n- Any NOW-33 row has non-empty `canonical_entity_uids`.\\n- Any NOW-33 row with candidate refs lacks `candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings=true`.\\n- Any NOW-33 row with candidate refs lacks `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=false`.\\n- Any candidate ref object lacks required structural fields: `entity_uid`, `canonical_name`, and `matched_surface`.\\n- Any row-level declared candidate-ref count differs from the actual number of candidate ref objects for that row.\\n- Any candidate ref resolves to a registry entity with `blocked_for_review=true`.\\n- Any candidate ref points to an entity UID absent from the configured registry.\\n- Any source/preflight/NOW-33 selected registry path mismatches.\\n- `target_source_fingerprint` is absent from any target registry build, built-candidate preflight, or NOW-33 reference rerun gate, or the values differ.\\n- Any required input artifact SHA-256 differs from the implementation input manifest.\\n- Any output artifact claims accepted binding, canonical writeback, evidence, provider execution, route transition, output-index mutation, or production acceptance.\\n- Any output artifact content scan detects forbidden claims such as `canonical_entity_uids` populated, `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=true`, accepted/operator overlay writeback, manual/provider/operator evidence, provider execution, route transition, output-index mutation, or production acceptance.\\n\\nThe guard may pass with review warnings if false-positive, missing-surface, alias-collision, or type-uncertainty risks are present, provided they are explicit review queue items and no forbidden writeback/acceptance authority is created.\\n\\n## Registry Content Review Queue\\n\\nEach unblocked registry entity review row must include:\\n\\n- `review_item_id`\\n- `entity_uid`\\n- `canonical_name`\\n- `aliases`\\n- `type`\\n- `subtype`\\n- `source_evidence_refs`\\n- `source_ref_count`\\n- `candidate_ref_count`\\n- `matched_surfaces`\\n- `matched_draft_row_ids`\\n- `risk_flags`\\n- `recommended_review_action`\\n- `allowed_review_actions`\\n- `advisory_only=true`\\n- `canonical_writeback_allowed=false`\\n\\nAllowed review actions are:\\n\\n- `keep_candidate_for_future_binding_review`\\n- `needs_alias_or_surface_review`\\n- `needs_type_subtype_review`\\n- `needs_split_or_merge_review`\\n- `exclude_from_future_binding_review`\\n- `defer_until_more_evidence`\\n\\nThese actions are review recommendations only. They do not become accepted overlay rows.\\n\\n## Candidate Ref Review Queue\\n\\nEach candidate ref review row must include:\\n\\n- `review_item_id`\\n- `draft_row_id`\\n- `chapter_index`\\n- `scene_number`\\n- `shot_number`\\n- `entity_uid`\\n- `canonical_name`\\n- `matched_surface`\\n- `match_source`\\n- `context_excerpt`\\n- `row_candidate_ref_count`\\n- `risk_flags`\\n- `recommended_review_action`\\n- `allowed_review_actions`\\n- `candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings=true`\\n- `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=false`\\n- `canonical_writeback_allowed=false`\\n\\nAllowed review actions are:\\n\\n- `candidate_ref_plausible_for_future_binding_review`\\n- `candidate_ref_surface_collision_risk`\\n- `candidate_ref_false_positive_suspected`\\n- `candidate_ref_needs_context_review`\\n- `candidate_ref_defer_until_registry_review`\\n\\nThese actions are review recommendations only and cannot mutate source rows or accepted overlays.\\n\\n## Risk Flags\\n\\nUse deterministic flags where possible:\\n\\n- `blocked_registry_entity_leak`\\n- `candidate_uid_missing_from_registry`\\n- `surface_collision`\\n- `alias_collision`\\n- `multiple_candidate_refs_in_row`\\n- `weak_source_support`\\n- `type_subtype_uncertain`\\n- `high_frequency_surface`\\n- `role_or_title_surface`\\n- `object_or_locat\", \"truncated\": true}, \"expected_json_schema\": {\"confidence\": \"high | medium | low\", \"findings\": [{\"category\": \"scope | validation | fingerprint | schema | review_surface | boundary | other\", \"description\": \"short\", \"required_fix\": \"short\", \"severity\": \"blocker | high | medium | low\"}], \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout | supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections | needs_fix_before_closeout | blocks_now33_candidate_consumption_guard\", \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"short string\", \"required_fixes\": [\"short string\"], \"scope_audit\": {\"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": \"boolean\", \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": \"boolean\", \"deepseek_advisory_only\": \"boolean\", \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": \"boolean\", \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": \"boolean\", \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": \"boolean\", \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": \"boolean\", \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": \"boolean\", \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": \"boolean\", \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": \"boolean\"}}, \"hard_boundaries\": {\"accepted_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"active_route_authority\": \"execution_state.json.next_entrypoint\", \"adapter_payload_allowed\": false, \"asset_binding_allowed\": false, \"asset_generation_or_acquisition_allowed\": false, \"candidate_consumption_guard_only\": true, \"candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings\": true, \"candidate_refs_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_entity_uid_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_uid_binding_acceptance_allowed\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_is_operator_production_acceptance\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_may_substitute_for_expert_advice\": true, \"deepseek_findings_have_direct_state_authority\": false, \"entity_store_writeback_allowed\": false, \"execution_state_next_entrypoint_unchanged\": true, \"feedback_intake_allowed\": false, \"held_row_promotion_allowed\": false, \"manual_provider_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"media_generation_allowed\": false, \"operator_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"operator_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"operator_production_acceptance_claimed\": false, \"outputs_index_mutation_allowed\": false, \"provider_job_execution_allowed\": false, \"provider_specific_prompt_allowed\": false, \"raw_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true, \"repair_execution_allowed\": false, \"replay_execution_allowed\": false, \"route_transition_allowed\": false, \"row_mutation_allowed\": false, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\"}, \"input_fingerprint\": \"19e2f006dd75febb0c97ddedbaf273ef2c80f9e2c744d9f1fc8e654da1525c5d\", \"previous_round\": {\"dir\": \".\", \"parsed\": {}, \"record\": {}}, \"role\": \"DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max independent advisory reviewer. Advisory-only.\", \"round_id\": \"round1\", \"source_guard_packet\": {\"gate\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"block_reasons\": [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"], \"blocked_registry_leak_check\": {\"blocked_registry_entity_leak_count\": 0, \"candidate_uid_missing_from_registry_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings\": true, \"candidate_ref_count_check\": {\"actual_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gap_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gate_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"mismatches\": [], \"row_declared_count_mismatch_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_ref_structural_check\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"schema_normalization_notes\": [\"candidate refs used legacy surface field; output normalized it to matched_surface\"], \"status\": \"pass\", \"structural_missing_count\": 0}, \"candidate_refs_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_uid_binding_acceptance_or_writeback_authorized\": false, \"canonical_uid_writeback_check\": {\"candidate_refs_with_forbidden_ref_writeback\": 0, \"canonical_uid_rows\": [], \"gate_canonical_entity_uid_bound_count\": 0, \"manifest_rows_with_canonical_entity_uids\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"created_at\": \"2026-06-07T07:31:37.798260Z\", \"deepseek_advisory_status\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"failure_count\": 7, \"failures\": [\"implementation_deepseek_round1_parse_not_pass\", \"implementation_deepseek_round1_call_not_success\", \"implementation_deepseek_round1_not_supporting\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_parse_not_pass\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_call_not_success\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_not_supporting\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_confidence_not_high\"], \"not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority\": true, \"round1\": {}, \"round2\": {}, \"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\"}, \"forbidden_side_effect_counts\": {\"accepted_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"adapter_payload_count\": 0, \"canonical_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"feedback_intake_count\": 0, \"manual_provider_evidence_count\": 0, \"media_generation_count\": 0, \"operator_evidence_creation_count\": 0, \"operator_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"outputs_index_mutation_count\": 0, \"provider_job_execution_count\": 0, \"provider_prompt_count\": 0, \"raw_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"repair_execution_count\": 0, \"replay_action_count\": 0}, \"gate_status\": \"pending_now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_implementation_deepseek_advisory\", \"input_integrity\": {\"checked_artifact_count\": 17, \"mismatch_count\": 0, \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_artifact_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"next_entrypoint_unchanged\": true, \"non_binding_flag_check\": {\"failure_count\": 0, \"failures\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority\": true, \"now33_macro_closeout_boundary\": \"not_closed\", \"output_forbidden_claim_scan\": {\"finding_count\": 0, \"findings\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"pass\": false, \"policy\": {\"accepted_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"active_route_authority\": \"execution_state.json.next_entrypoint\", \"adapter_payload_allowed\": false, \"asset_binding_allowed\": false, \"asset_generation_or_acquisition_allowed\": false, \"candidate_consumption_guard_only\": true, \"candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings\": true, \"candidate_refs_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_entity_uid_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_uid_binding_acceptance_allowed\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_is_operator_production_acceptance\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_may_substitute_for_expert_advice\": true, \"deepseek_findings_have_direct_state_authority\": false, \"entity_store_writeback_allowed\": false, \"execution_state_next_entrypoint_unchanged\": true, \"feedback_intake_allowed\": false, \"held_row_promotion_allowed\": false, \"manual_provider_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"media_generation_allowed\": false, \"operator_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"operator_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"operator_production_acceptance_claimed\": false, \"outputs_index_mutation_allowed\": false, \"provider_job_execution_allowed\": false, \"provider_specific_prompt_allowed\": false, \"raw_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true, \"repair_execution_allowed\": false, \"replay_execution_allowed\": false, \"route_transition_allowed\": false, \"row_mutation_allowed\": false, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\"}, \"registry_path_check\": {\"expected_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_required_path_keys\": [], \"observed_paths\": {\"now33_input_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"now33_registry_discovery_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"preflight_selected_candidate_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"target_registry_candidate\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\"}, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"review_queue_coverage\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"registry_content_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"status\": \"pass\", \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28}, \"source_fingerprint_check\": {\"inference_basis\": \"\", \"required_absent_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\", \"unique_nonempty_fingerprints\": [\"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"], \"values\": {\"built_candidate_preflight_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"now33_reference_rerun_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"selected_registry_payload\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"target_registry_build_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"}}, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\", \"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\", \"summary\": {\"accepted_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"adapter_payload_count\": 0, \"blocked_registry_entity_count\": 685, \"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"canonical_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"feedback_intake_count\": 0, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"manual_provider_evidence_count\": 0, \"media_generation_count\": 0, \"missing_high_value_surface_count\": 0, \"now33_manifest_row_count\": 1638, \"operator_evidence_creation_count\": 0, \"operator_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"output_forbidden_claim_finding_count\": 0, \"outputs_index_mutation_count\": 0, \"provider_job_execution_count\": 0, \"provider_prompt_count\": 0, \"raw_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"registry_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"repair_execution_count\": 0, \"replay_action_count\": 0, \"rows_with_candidate_refs\": 1056, \"surface_collision_count\": 0, \"target_registry_entity_count\": 713, \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28, \"validator_failure_count\": 1, \"validator_warning_count\": 1}, \"version\": \"now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.v1\", \"warnings\": [\"candidate_ref_surface_field_normalized_to_matched_surface\"]}, \"gate_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.json\", \"sha256\": \"34df3e0fdad1a8024024d14a779c4a2989b72c648e78fb54be72eacea79da299\", \"size_bytes\": 8110}, \"guard_report_checks\": {\"blocked_registry_leak_check\": {\"blocked_registry_entity_leak_count\": 0, \"candidate_uid_missing_from_registry_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_ref_count_check\": {\"actual_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gap_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gate_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"mismatches\": [], \"row_declared_count_mismatch_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_ref_structural_check\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"schema_normalization_notes\": [\"candidate refs used legacy surface field; output normalized it to matched_surface\"], \"status\": \"pass\", \"structural_missing_count\": 0}, \"canonical_uid_writeback_check\": {\"candidate_refs_with_forbidden_ref_writeback\": 0, \"canonical_uid_rows\": [], \"gate_canonical_entity_uid_bound_count\": 0, \"manifest_rows_with_canonical_entity_uids\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"input_integrity\": {\"checked_artifact_count\": 17, \"mismatch_count\": 0, \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_artifact_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"non_binding_flag_check\": {\"failure_count\": 0, \"failures\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"registry_path_check\": {\"expected_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_required_path_keys\": [], \"observed_paths\": {\"now33_input_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"now33_registry_discovery_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"preflight_selected_candidate_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"target_registry_candidate\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\"}, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"review_queue_coverage\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"registry_content_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"status\": \"pass\", \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28}, \"source_fingerprint_check\": {\"inference_basis\": \"\", \"required_absent_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\", \"unique_nonempty_fingerprints\": [\"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"], \"values\": {\"built_candidate_preflight_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"now33_reference_rerun_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"selected_registry_payload\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"target_registry_build_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"}}}, \"report_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_report.json\", \"sha256\": \"deb532e39a84301dc4d7760d824577d2326fb984133068953add6a83c282ac1d\", \"size_bytes\": 10888}, \"review_summary\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"blocked_registry_entity_count\": 685, \"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"canonical_writeback_allowed\": false, \"created_at\": \"2026-06-07T07:31:37.744887Z\", \"missing_high_value_surface_count\": 0, \"not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority\": true, \"now33_manifest_row_count\": 1638, \"registry_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"risk_flag_counts\": {\"high_frequency_surface\": 1111, \"multiple_candidate_refs_in_row\": 799, \"object_or_location_surface\": 19, \"role_or_title_surface\": 194}, \"rows_with_candidate_refs\": 1056, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\", \"status\": \"review_packet_built\", \"surface_collision_count\": 0, \"target_registry_entity_count\": 713, \"top_surfaces\": [{\"count\": 418, \"surface\": \"宝玉\"}, {\"count\": 267, \"surface\": \"凤姐\"}, {\"count\": 120, \"surface\": \"黛玉\"}, {\"count\": 73, \"surface\": \"秦钟\"}, {\"count\": 66, \"surface\": \"贾政\"}, {\"count\": 55, \"surface\": \"宝钗\"}, {\"count\": 52, \"surface\": \"贾珍\"}, {\"count\": 52, \"surface\": \"刘姥姥\"}, {\"count\": 48, \"surface\": \"秦氏\"}, {\"count\": 47, \"surface\": \"尤氏\"}, {\"count\": 45, \"surface\": \"贾母\"}, {\"count\": 37, \"surface\": \"贾琏\"}, {\"count\": 35, \"surface\": \"平儿\"}, {\"count\": 30, \"surface\": \"贾雨村\"}, {\"count\": 18, \"surface\": \"李嬷嬷\"}, {\"count\": 17, \"surface\": \"封肃\"}, {\"count\": 16, \"surface\": \"薛姨妈\"}, {\"count\": 13, \"surface\": \"李贵\"}, {\"count\": 10, \"surface\": \"甄士隐\"}, {\"count\": 10, \"surface\": \"李纨\"}], \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28, \"version\": \"now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard.v1\"}, \"review_summary_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_review_summary.json\", \"sha256\": \"3318ae382ed239a8c7e01e4a1b2b0abdf2fd470a748520b7525b944b03b109bf\", \"size_bytes\": 2112}, \"source_guard_run_dir\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137\", \"validation_failures\": [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"], \"validation_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_validation_report.json\", \"sha256\": \"01d3556e461fc003224356ee0f937b4a52a9e5b97824db5554d8969cb05b8d9f\", \"size_bytes\": 7799}, \"validation_summary\": {\"accepted_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"adapter_payload_count\": 0, \"blocked_registry_entity_count\": 685, \"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"canonical_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"feedback_intake_count\": 0, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"manual_provider_evidence_count\": 0, \"media_generation_count\": 0, \"missing_high_value_surface_count\": 0, \"now33_manifest_row_count\": 1638, \"operator_evidence_creation_count\": 0, \"operator_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"output_forbidden_claim_finding_count\": 0, \"outputs_index_mutation_count\": 0, \"provider_job_execution_count\": 0, \"provider_prompt_count\": 0, \"raw_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"registry_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"repair_execution_count\": 0, \"replay_action_count\": 0, \"rows_with_candidate_refs\": 1056, \"surface_collision_count\": 0, \"target_registry_entity_count\": 713, \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28, \"validator_failure_count\": 1, \"validator_warning_count\": 1}, \"validation_warnings\": [\"candidate_ref_surface_field_normalized_to_matched_surface\"]}, \"task\": \"Audit NOW-33 candidate consumption guard and registry-content review. Return JSON only.\"}"
    }
  ],
  "message_fingerprint": "5e4626c1fdc9a0cd01b083bb0d19cf2bbbc65ffbb5df3df7f637960f2ec65120",
  "response_text": "{\n  \"confidence\": \"high\",\n  \"findings\": [\n    {\n      \"category\": \"boundary\",\n      \"description\": \"Guard structurally sound; all forbidden writeback and mutation paths blocked. DeepSeek advisory pending is an expected process step.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\",\n  \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSEOUT_AFTER_DEEPSEEK_ROUND2\",\n  \"required_fixes\": [],\n  \"scope_audit\": {\n    \"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": true,\n    \"deepseek_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": true,\n    \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": true,\n    \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": true,\n    \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": true,\n    \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true,\n    \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true,\n    \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": true\n  }\n}",
  "raw_response": {
    "id": "1e257748-e910-4b8f-b70e-6b7c2edfda67",
    "object": "chat.completion",
    "created": 1780817910,
    "model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
    "choices": [
      {
        "index": 0,
        "message": {
          "role": "assistant",
          "content": "{\n  \"confidence\": \"high\",\n  \"findings\": [\n    {\n      \"category\": \"boundary\",\n      \"description\": \"Guard structurally sound; all forbidden writeback and mutation paths blocked. DeepSeek advisory pending is an expected process step.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\",\n  \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSEOUT_AFTER_DEEPSEEK_ROUND2\",\n  \"required_fixes\": [],\n  \"scope_audit\": {\n    \"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": true,\n    \"deepseek_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": true,\n    \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": true,\n    \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": true,\n    \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": true,\n    \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true,\n    \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true,\n    \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": true\n  }\n}",
          "reasoning_content": "We are asked to perform a Round 1 audit of the NOW-33 candidate consumption guard. The advisory question: \"Round 1: audit whether a future program rerun of the NOW-33 candidate consumption guard can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and later paired with a successful Round 2 record. Do not treat the absence of Round 2 during Round 1 as a defect or high finding; it is the expected next process step.\"\n\nWe must return compact JSON with a specific schema: findings array, overall_verdict, recommended_closeout_label, required_fixes, and a scope_audit object with boolean values. We are also given consultation_process_boundary rules: we are in round1, must not claim single round changes gate pass, final guard pass requires program rerun with two successful implementation deepseek dirs, round1 may state round2 is next process step without defect, etc. Also, this consultation cannot mutate or reclassify the source guard gate; it is advisory only.\n\nWe have extensive context: source guard packet, gate, report, review summary, validation, etc. The gate shows status: pending_deepseek_advisory, with deepseek_advisory_status: pending_deepseek_advisory, failures list includes round1 and round2 failures (since not performed yet?). It says:\n\n\"deepseek_advisory_status\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"failure_count\": 7, \"failures\": [\"implementation_deepseek_round1_parse_not_pass\", \"implementation_deepseek_round1_call_not_success\", \"implementation_deepseek_round1_not_supporting\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_parse_not_pass\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_call_not_success\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_not_supporting\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_confidence_not_high\"], ... \"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\"}\n\nAnd the gate pass is false, block_reasons: [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"].\n\nNow, our task as Round 1 auditor is to assess whether after this consultation is recorded and later paired with a successful Round 2 record, a future program rerun can close as no-writeback boundary. Essentially, we need to verify that the guard as currently built (the source guard packet) is structurally correct, no forbidden actions, and that the only thing missing is the DeepSeek advisory rounds. Then in a future rerun where both rounds are successful, the guard can close (pass) as no-writeback boundary.\n\nWe must output findings accordingly. The expected JSON schema says:\n\n- confidence: high | medium | low (we can set medium or high depending on our assessment)\n- findings: array of objects with category, description, required_fix, severity.\n- overall_verdict: one of the given strings: supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout, supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections, needs_fix_before_closeout, blocks_now33_candidate_consumption_guard.\n- recommended_closeout_label: short string\n- required_fixes: array of strings\n- scope_audit: an object with several boolean fields (candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only, canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked, deepseek_advisory_only, fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass, kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked, now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable, provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked, registry_content_review_packet_only, surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable, this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate).\n\nWe need to evaluate based on the provided source guard packet and the contract. The instruction says: \"Audit whether a future program rerun of the NOW-33 candidate consumption guard can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and later paired with a successful Round 2 record.\" So we are not to say it's ready now, but that with a successful round 2, the rerun can close.\n\nWe must also note any issues that would prevent that. Looking at the gate, most checks pass: input integrity, source fingerprint, registry path, candidate ref structural (with normalization note), count check, non-binding flag, blocked registry leak, canonical uid writeback check, output forbidden claim scan, review queue coverage. The only non-passing part is deepseek_advisory_status with pending status and failures listed. But these failures are because the round 1 and round 2 haven't been successfully performed yet. In a future rerun, if both rounds are successful, the gate would presumably pass.\n\nHowever, there might be other concerns: The gate has a warning: \"candidate_ref_surface_field_normalized_to_matched_surface\". This is acceptable per scope_audit \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\". Also note the deepseek_advisory_status says \"failure_count\": 7, but those are the current state before consultation? Actually, the \"failures\" list includes round1 and round2 failures. It seems the gate was pre-populated with expected failure conditions that would be cleared upon successful rounds. That is a design choice: the gate expects both rounds to succeed and then would update pass/fail accordingly. So in the future rerun, if round 1 and round 2 succeed, those failures would be cleared.\n\nThus, the guard as built does not have any structural defects that would prevent closeout as no-writeback. The only requirement is the advisory rounds. Also, we need to verify no forbidden actions were taken: the reports show 0 counts for all forbidden side effects. The advisory_only flags are set. So everything seems in order.\n\nNow, we need to produce findings. The contract says \"do not treat the absence of round 2 as a defect or high finding\". So we must not flag that as a problem; it's expected. However, we might note that round 1 is currently being performed, so the gate is pending. We can state that with a successful round 2, the guard can close. Our overall_verdict should likely be \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\" or perhaps \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\" if we think some minor adjustments are needed. But looking at the gate, the only \"failures\" are the missing deepseek rounds; they aren't really corrections needed in the guard implementation itself, but the process of completing the advisory. Since the question is about a future program rerun with these records, I'd lean that the guard currently supports closeout but is pending the advisory process. So the verdict could be \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\" provided that round 2 is successful. But the expected options include \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\". However, the consultation_process_boundary says \"round1_must_not_mark_the_absence_of_round2_as_a_defect_or_high_finding\". So we shouldn't say that there's a defect. Therefore, we could say the guard as implemented is correct and will pass once advisory rounds complete.\n\nLet's see the overall_verdict options: \n- supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout: means the guard can close as no-writeback.\n- supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections: means it needs corrections.\n- needs_fix_before_closeout: means there are issues that must be fixed before it can close.\n- blocks_now33_candidate_consumption_guard: means it's fundamentally flawed.\n\nBased on the supplied gate, there are no real blockers; everything is passing except the advisory. Since the advisory is a process step and not a defect of the guard, we could say it supports closeout. But the gate's pass is false, so in its current state it wouldn't close. However, the audit is about a future program rerun after this consultation is recorded and paired with successful round 2. In that future rerun, the deepseek_advisory_status would be updated to pass, and the block_reasons would be empty. So the guard would close.\n\nTherefore, we could give overall_verdict \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\". But we need to be careful: The guard currently has a warning about surface normalization, and the deepseek advisory has a note about legacy surface normalization. That seems acceptable per the scope_audit flag. Also, the missing fingerprint warning: \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\". That's interesting: in the source_fingerprint_check, the values show \"selected_registry_payload\": fingerprint, whereas the other three are from gates. But it doesn't say any is missing. Actually, it says \"inference_basis\": \"\", which might be a minor issue, but the status is \"pass\". So it's fine.\n\nWe should produce a scope_audit object with all required booleans:\n\n- candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only: true (all candidate refs are not canonical)\n- canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked: true (no writeback)\n- deepseek_advisory_only: true\n- fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass: true (since round 2 is needed)\n- kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked: true (no mutations allowed)\n- now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable: true (we need to decide; the fingerprint check passed, but maybe there's a missing fingerprint in some context. The gate's source_fingerprint_check has \"inference_basis\": \"\", but it's still pass. The scope_audit says \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\". I think that's meant to be true if we find no issue.)\n- provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked: true\n- registry_content_review_packet_only: true\n- surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable: true\n- this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate: true (our advisory does not change the gate)\n\nNow, findings: we could list a few low-severity informational findings. Since the consultation process says we must not treat missing round 2 as defect, we might note that the deepseek advisory status is pending, but that is expected. We could also note the warning about legacy surface normalization, but that is already documented and acceptable. We should probably not add any findings that would imply a required fix, because the guard is structurally sound. But the schema expects findings array; we can include an empty array or a finding with severity low that notes the pending advisory and that a rerun will close it. However, to be safe, we can include a finding that the guard cannot close until round 2 is successfully completed, but that is not a defect; it's a process. Since the instruction says \"Do not treat the absence of Round 2 during Round 1 as a defect or high finding\", we shouldn't create a finding that flags it as a problem. So maybe we don't need to include that in findings. Instead, we could note that there are no findings that would block closeout. So the findings array could be empty.\n\nBut the expected schema shows \"confidence\": \"high | medium | low\", and \"findings\": array. I can leave findings empty or include a generic note. However, the schema also has \"required_fixes\": [\"short string\"], which implies if there are required fixes. Since there are none required before closeout (only the round 2 process), we can set required_fixes to an empty array or a note that no fixes are needed. The schema might be illustrative; we need to output valid JSON conforming to the advisory contract.\n\nI think the safest approach: findings with one entry: category \"boundary\", description \"Guard is structurally sound with all forbiddens blocked; pending only DeepSeek advisory rounds completion.\", severity \"low\", required_fix \"none\". But is that a finding? It's more a status. Alternatively, we could produce an empty findings array, but the schema might expect at least one. Let's see the example: \"findings\": [{\"category\": \"scope | validation | fingerprint | schema | review_surface | boundary | other\", \"description\": \"short\", \"required_fix\": \"short\", \"severity\": \"blocker | high | medium | low\"}]. So we can have zero or more.\n\nI'll include a single finding with low severity indicating the guard's only remaining step is round 2, and that no other issues exist. That aligns with the advisory question. And required_fixes: empty. Overall verdict: \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\". Recommended_closeout_label: something like \"PASS_NO_WRITEBACK_PENDING_DEEPSEEK_ROUND2\" or just \"NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSEOUT_READY\". But the label should reflect that after round 2 it can close. I'll set it to \"READY_FOR_CLOSEOUT_AFTER_DEEPSEEK_ROUND2\". However, the advisory may want a short string. Let's think: the guard gate status is \"pending_now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_implementation_deepseek_advisory\". After round 2, it would become \"pass\". So the closeout label could be \"NOW33_CANDIDATE_CONSUMPTION_GUARD_NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSED\". But since we are in round 1, we can't claim it's closed now. The question is whether future rerun can close. So we can recommend that it can be closed with a label indicating that.\n\nI'll set recommended_closeout_label: \"NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSEOUT_AFTER_DEEPSEEK_ROUND2\". Or more precisely: \"NOW33_CANDIDATE_CONSUMPTION_GUARD_NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSEOUT\". To be safe, I'll use the contract's terminology: \"no-writeback boundary closeout\".\n\nNow, scope_audit booleans:\n\nWe need to set each based on our analysis.\n\n- candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only: true (evident from gate)\n- canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked: true (gate confirms)\n- deepseek_advisory_only: true\n- fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass: true (since round 2 is needed)\n- kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked: true (forbidden work)\n- now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable: true (fingerprint check passes)\n- provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked: true\n- registry_content_review_packet_only: true (contract says registry content review packet only)\n- surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable: true (warned but acceptable)\n- this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate: true\n\nNow, confidence: high, because the guard report shows all checks passing, and the only thing needed is the advisory process.\n\nSo the final JSON:\n\n{\n  \"confidence\": \"high\",\n  \"findings\": [\n    {\n      \"category\": \"boundary\",\n      \"description\": \"Guard structurally sound; all forbidden writeback and mutation paths blocked. DeepSeek advisory pending is an expected process step.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\",\n  \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"NO_WRITEBACK_CLOSEOUT_AFTER_DEEPSEEK_ROUND2\",\n  \"required_fixes\": [],\n  \"scope_audit\": {\n    \"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": true,\n    \"deepseek_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": true,\n    \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": true,\n    \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": true,\n    \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": true,\n    \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true,\n    \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true,\n    \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": true\n  }\n}\n\nBut wait: The contract says \"DeepSeek advisory remains advisory-only and cannot become evidence, operator acceptance, canonical state, writeback authority, route authority, or output-index authority.\" That's respected. Also, \"this_consultation_record_must_be_written_first_then_passed_into_a_fresh_guard_rerun\". So our output is a record that will be used later.\n\nWe must ensure we do not claim that this single round directly changes the gate pass. Our verdict is about future rerun.\n\nNow, check if there are any hidden issues. The gate has \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476 and a note. That's fine. The warning is acceptable. The deepseek_advisory_status failures list includes round1 and round2; those are placeholder failures before the advisory is run. Once round1 and round2 succeed, those will be cleared. However, we need to be mindful: The gate currently has \"round1\": {}, \"round2\": {}, and \"failures\": [...]. That suggests the gate is designed to be updated after each round. In a future rerun, the program would evaluate the deepseek advisory dirs and update the gate accordingly. So there's no structural issue.\n\nOne more thing: The scope_audit flag \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\" might need a bit of attention. In the gate, source_fingerprint_check has \"inference_basis\": \"\". That might be considered a missing inference basis, but it's not a failure. The contract might allow that. The scope_audit boolean is true, meaning we accept that. So it's fine.\n\nAlso, \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true.\n\nNow, the overall_verdict options: the one we chose indicates that the guard supports closeout. But is that accurate if the gate currently doesn't pass? The verdict is about whether the guard as implemented can close after the process. Since there are no required corrections (except the advisory process, which isn't a correction), it does support closeout. However, if we interpret \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\" as meaning that the guard needs some changes (like fixing the surface normalization), that's not the case. So \"supports...no_writeback_closeout\" is correct.\n\nWe must return compact JSON only. So output exactly that JSON with no additional text.\n\nLet's double-check the required fields in the expected schema: it includes \"recommended_closeout_label\" and \"required_fixes\". Our required_fixes is empty array. That's fine.\n\nOne potential nuance: The advisory question says \"audit whether a future program rerun ... can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and later paired with a successful Round 2 record.\" So we need to explicitly consider that this consultation record (our output) will be used. We are in round 1. We produce a record. Then in round 2, another DeepSeek consultation runs. Then a fresh guard rerun uses both records to determine final pass. We are to confirm that the guard's structure allows that final closeout. Our job is to verify that the guard's implementation does not have any forbidden actions or structural defects that would prevent closeout even after successful rounds. And we should not flag the absence of round 2 as a defect.\n\nOur finding description says \"Guard structurally sound... DeepSeek advisory pending is an expected process step.\" That's fine.\n\nAlso, the scope_audit boolean \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\" is true. That indicates that a rerun is required after round 2, which is correct.\n\nNow, the confidence: \"high\". All checks pass aside from the advisory, which is process.\n\nThus, final output.\n\nOne more check: The source guard packet shows \"now33_macro_closeout_boundary\": \"not_closed\". That's expected. Our verdict should not change that.\n\nI'll produce the JSON."
        },
        "logprobs": null,
        "finish_reason": "stop"
      }
    ],
    "usage": {
      "prompt_tokens": 9506,
      "completion_tokens": 4723,
      "total_tokens": 14229,
      "prompt_tokens_details": {
        "cached_tokens": 0
      },
      "completion_tokens_details": {
        "reasoning_tokens": 4416
      },
      "prompt_cache_hit_tokens": 0,
      "prompt_cache_miss_tokens": 9506
    },
    "system_fingerprint": "fp_9954b31ca7_prod0820_fp8_kvcache_20260402"
  },
  "raw_response_meta": {
    "id": "1e257748-e910-4b8f-b70e-6b7c2edfda67",
    "object": "chat.completion",
    "model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
    "usage": {
      "prompt_tokens": 9506,
      "completion_tokens": 4723,
      "total_tokens": 14229,
      "prompt_tokens_details": {
        "cached_tokens": 0
      },
      "completion_tokens_details": {
        "reasoning_tokens": 4416
      },
      "prompt_cache_hit_tokens": 0,
      "prompt_cache_miss_tokens": 9506
    },
    "finish_reason": "stop",
    "content_chars": 1084,
    "reasoning_content_present": true,
    "reasoning_content_chars": 18938
  }
}