{
  "version": "now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_deepseek_consultation.v1",
  "created_at": "2026-06-07T07:37:50.582450Z",
  "call_status": "success",
  "provider_meta": {
    "provider": "deepseek_reviewer",
    "model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
    "base_url": "https://api.deepseek.com/chat/completions",
    "thinking_type": "enabled",
    "reasoning_effort": "max",
    "max_tokens": 32000,
    "timeout_seconds": 600,
    "temperature": 0.0,
    "skipped": false
  },
  "messages": [
    {
      "role": "system",
      "content": "You are an independent pipeline boundary auditor. Return compact JSON only. Advisory-only."
    },
    {
      "role": "user",
      "content": "{\"active_route\": {\"execution_state_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/execution_state.json\", \"sha256\": \"5432a7e0256dbc1b4a8f8a9659d63395b361c68feae9cfb3d27ac2c4734424b7\", \"size_bytes\": 82528}, \"next_entrypoint_id\": \"platform_neutral_prompt_readiness_manual_execution_log_contract\"}, \"advisory_question\": \"Round 1: audit whether a future program rerun of the NOW-33 candidate consumption guard can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and supplied as implementation_deepseek_round1_dir, with candidate refs remaining advisory-only.\", \"consultation_process_boundary\": {\"current_source_guard_packet_may_show_pending_deepseek\": true, \"deepseek_must_audit_whether_a_future_program_rerun_with_these_records_can_close_no_writeback\": true, \"deepseek_must_not_claim_its_single_round_directly_changes_gate_pass\": true, \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\": true, \"this_consultation_cannot_mutate_or_reclassify_the_source_guard_gate\": true, \"this_consultation_record_must_be_written_first_then_passed_into_a_fresh_guard_rerun\": true}, \"contract_excerpt\": {\"char_count\": 17282, \"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/docs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_contract_20260607.md\", \"sha256\": \"b1ed73c869e27fb8ed3fe22e3cd85ec61af62bcf25dce745f86dffd7366edbf2\", \"text\": \"# NOW-33 Reference Candidate Consumption Guard And Registry Content Review Contract\\n\\n更新时间：`2026-06-07T14:40:40+08:00`\\n\\n## Status\\n\\n- contract id: `now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_contract`\\n- status: `contract_landed_pending_implementation`\\n- active route authority: `execution_state.json.next_entrypoint`\\n- active route remains: `platform_neutral_prompt_readiness_manual_execution_log_contract`\\n- source retrospective: `docs/now33_reference_registry_rerun_retrospective_20260607.md`\\n- source NOW-33 rerun: `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049`\\n- source registry build: `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032`\\n- source built-candidate preflight: `outputs/current_registry_authority_preflight_for_built_candidate_20260607_0034`\\n- DeepSeek v4 pro Round 1: `outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_contract_deepseek_pro_consultation_20260607_143239`\\n- DeepSeek v4 pro Round 2: `outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_contract_deepseek_pro_consultation_round2_20260607_143656`\\n- superseded non-pro advisory record: `outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_contract_deepseek_consultation_20260607_143046`\\n\\n## Purpose\\n\\nNOW-33 reference-registry rerun produced `1476` exact-surface `candidate_entity_refs` across `1056` of `1638` prompt draft rows. These refs are useful review signals, but they are not canonical bindings.\\n\\nThis contract defines the next implementation step before any canonical UID binding, KG/raw KG/entity-store writeback, row mutation, asset binding, evidence pack, route transition, or production acceptance:\\n\\n1. Build deterministic consumption guards so downstream code cannot treat `candidate_entity_refs` as `canonical_entity_uids`.\\n2. Build a registry content review packet for the `28` unblocked registry entities and the `1476` candidate refs.\\n3. Produce review/gap/risk artifacts that prepare, but do not execute, a future canonical UID binding acceptance/writeback contract.\\n\\n## Inputs\\n\\nRequired read-only inputs:\\n\\n- `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_gate.json`\\n- `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json`\\n- `outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_source_entity_candidate_manifest.jsonl`\\n- `outputs/current_registry_authority_preflight_for_built_candidate_20260607_0034/NOW_33A_current_registry_gate.json`\\n- `outputs/current_registry_authority_preflight_for_built_candidate_20260607_0034/NOW_33A_registry_candidate_manifest.jsonl`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_entity_link_gate.json`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_entity_link_advisory_manifest.jsonl`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_entity_gap_report.json`\\n- `outputs/now33_entity_link_binding_with_built_registry_20260607_0049/NOW_33_registry_discovery_report.json`\\n- DeepSeek final advisory refs for registry build and NOW-33 rerun.\\n\\nAll inputs remain source artifacts only. Reading these inputs does not create acceptance, evidence, canonical authority, or writeback authority.\\n\\n## Allowed Work\\n\\nImplementation may:\\n\\n- Parse and validate the required input gates/manifests.\\n- Verify that the configured registry path, selected preflight path, and NOW-33 registry discovery path match.\\n- Verify SHA-256 integrity for all required input artifacts recorded in the implementation input manifest before processing.\\n- Verify that `target_source_fingerprint` exists and matches across the target registry build gate, built-candidate preflight gate, and NOW-33 reference rerun gate.\\n- Verify that every NOW-33 row with candidate refs includes `candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings=true` and `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=false`.\\n- Verify that every candidate ref object is structurally valid before review queue generation.\\n- Verify that every referenced candidate comes from a registry entity with `blocked_for_review=false`.\\n- Verify row-level candidate-ref count consistency between declared row counts and actual candidate ref arrays.\\n- Build a candidate-ref consumption guard report with pass/block findings.\\n- Build a registry content review queue covering the `28` unblocked registry entities.\\n- Build a candidate-ref review queue covering the `1476` candidate refs, grouped by entity UID, surface, draft row, chapter, scene, and shot.\\n- Flag likely false positives, missing high-value surfaces, blocked-entity leakage, alias/surface collisions, duplicate-surface risks, weak support, and type/subtype uncertainty.\\n- Generate side-effect-free JSON/JSONL/HTML artifacts under a new output run.\\n- Run two DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max advisory rounds over the contract and output packet if the implementation asserts closeout/readiness.\\n\\n## Forbidden Work\\n\\nThis contract does not authorize:\\n\\n- canonical UID binding acceptance or writeback;\\n- KG/raw KG/entity-store writeback;\\n- accepted/operator overlay writeback;\\n- draft, held, readiness, execution-log, or prompt-row mutation;\\n- held-row promotion, waiver, or repair execution;\\n- asset generation, acquisition, or binding;\\n- provider-specific prompt generation, adapter payload generation, provider job execution, or media generation;\\n- manual/provider/operator evidence creation;\\n- feedback intake, repair, replay, or replay eligibility;\\n- route transition or `execution_state.json.next_entrypoint` change;\\n- `outputs/index.json` or `outputs/index-lite.json` mutation;\\n- production readiness or production acceptance.\\n\\nDeepSeek advisory remains advisory-only and cannot become evidence, operator acceptance, canonical state, writeback authority, route authority, or output-index authority.\\n\\n## Required Output Artifacts\\n\\nThe implementation should create a new output run, for example:\\n\\n`outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_<timestamp>`\\n\\nRequired artifacts:\\n\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_input.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_registry_content_review_queue.jsonl`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_ref_review_queue.jsonl`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_surface_collision_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_missing_high_value_surface_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_review_summary.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_validation_report.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.json`\\n- `NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_review.html`\\n- `manifest.json`\\n\\nIf DeepSeek consultation is run for implementation closeout, store consultation inputs/messages/raw/parsed/record files in dedicated output directories and reference them from the gate. These records are review aids only and must never be used as provider/manual/operator evidence, accepted overlay, canonical facts, route authority, or output-index authority.\\n\\n## Required Output Schemas\\n\\n`manifest.json` must include at minimum:\\n\\n- `version`\\n- `created_at`\\n- `run_id`\\n- `stage`\\n- `status`\\n- `input_artifacts` with `path`, `sha256`, and `size_bytes`\\n- `output_artifacts` with `path`, `sha256`, `size_bytes`, and `artifact_role`\\n- `deepseek_advisory_refs`\\n- `forbidden_side_effect_counts`\\n- `advisory_only=true`\\n- `not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority=true`\\n\\n`NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.json` must include at minimum:\\n\\n- `version`\\n- `created_at`\\n- `status`\\n- `pass`\\n- `block_reasons`\\n- `warnings`\\n- `input_integrity`\\n- `source_fingerprint_check`\\n- `registry_path_check`\\n- `candidate_ref_structural_check`\\n- `candidate_ref_count_check`\\n- `non_binding_flag_check`\\n- `blocked_registry_leak_check`\\n- `canonical_uid_writeback_check`\\n- `output_forbidden_claim_scan`\\n- `review_queue_coverage`\\n- `deepseek_advisory_status`\\n- `forbidden_side_effect_counts`\\n- `next_entrypoint_unchanged`\\n- `advisory_only=true`\\n- `not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority=true`\\n\\n## Consumption Guard Rules\\n\\nThe guard must block if any of the following are true:\\n\\n- `execution_state.json.next_entrypoint` changed.\\n- NOW-33 rerun gate is not `advisory_entity_link_binding_closed_reference_registry_no_writeback`.\\n- NOW-33 rerun gate has `canonical_entity_uid_bound_count != 0`.\\n- Any NOW-33 row has non-empty `canonical_entity_uids`.\\n- Any NOW-33 row with candidate refs lacks `candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings=true`.\\n- Any NOW-33 row with candidate refs lacks `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=false`.\\n- Any candidate ref object lacks required structural fields: `entity_uid`, `canonical_name`, and `matched_surface`.\\n- Any row-level declared candidate-ref count differs from the actual number of candidate ref objects for that row.\\n- Any candidate ref resolves to a registry entity with `blocked_for_review=true`.\\n- Any candidate ref points to an entity UID absent from the configured registry.\\n- Any source/preflight/NOW-33 selected registry path mismatches.\\n- `target_source_fingerprint` is absent from any target registry build, built-candidate preflight, or NOW-33 reference rerun gate, or the values differ.\\n- Any required input artifact SHA-256 differs from the implementation input manifest.\\n- Any output artifact claims accepted binding, canonical writeback, evidence, provider execution, route transition, output-index mutation, or production acceptance.\\n- Any output artifact content scan detects forbidden claims such as `canonical_entity_uids` populated, `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=true`, accepted/operator overlay writeback, manual/provider/operator evidence, provider execution, route transition, output-index mutation, or production acceptance.\\n\\nThe guard may pass with review warnings if false-positive, missing-surface, alias-collision, or type-uncertainty risks are present, provided they are explicit review queue items and no forbidden writeback/acceptance authority is created.\\n\\n## Registry Content Review Queue\\n\\nEach unblocked registry entity review row must include:\\n\\n- `review_item_id`\\n- `entity_uid`\\n- `canonical_name`\\n- `aliases`\\n- `type`\\n- `subtype`\\n- `source_evidence_refs`\\n- `source_ref_count`\\n- `candidate_ref_count`\\n- `matched_surfaces`\\n- `matched_draft_row_ids`\\n- `risk_flags`\\n- `recommended_review_action`\\n- `allowed_review_actions`\\n- `advisory_only=true`\\n- `canonical_writeback_allowed=false`\\n\\nAllowed review actions are:\\n\\n- `keep_candidate_for_future_binding_review`\\n- `needs_alias_or_surface_review`\\n- `needs_type_subtype_review`\\n- `needs_split_or_merge_review`\\n- `exclude_from_future_binding_review`\\n- `defer_until_more_evidence`\\n\\nThese actions are review recommendations only. They do not become accepted overlay rows.\\n\\n## Candidate Ref Review Queue\\n\\nEach candidate ref review row must include:\\n\\n- `review_item_id`\\n- `draft_row_id`\\n- `chapter_index`\\n- `scene_number`\\n- `shot_number`\\n- `entity_uid`\\n- `canonical_name`\\n- `matched_surface`\\n- `match_source`\\n- `context_excerpt`\\n- `row_candidate_ref_count`\\n- `risk_flags`\\n- `recommended_review_action`\\n- `allowed_review_actions`\\n- `candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings=true`\\n- `candidate_refs_writeback_allowed=false`\\n- `canonical_writeback_allowed=false`\\n\\nAllowed review actions are:\\n\\n- `candidate_ref_plausible_for_future_binding_review`\\n- `candidate_ref_surface_collision_risk`\\n- `candidate_ref_false_positive_suspected`\\n- `candidate_ref_needs_context_review`\\n- `candidate_ref_defer_until_registry_review`\\n\\nThese actions are review recommendations only and cannot mutate source rows or accepted overlays.\\n\\n## Risk Flags\\n\\nUse deterministic flags where possible:\\n\\n- `blocked_registry_entity_leak`\\n- `candidate_uid_missing_from_registry`\\n- `surface_collision`\\n- `alias_collision`\\n- `multiple_candidate_refs_in_row`\\n- `weak_source_support`\\n- `type_subtype_uncertain`\\n- `high_frequency_surface`\\n- `role_or_title_surface`\\n- `object_or_locat\", \"truncated\": true}, \"expected_json_schema\": {\"confidence\": \"high | medium | low\", \"findings\": [{\"category\": \"scope | validation | fingerprint | schema | review_surface | boundary | other\", \"description\": \"short\", \"required_fix\": \"short\", \"severity\": \"blocker | high | medium | low\"}], \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout | supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections | needs_fix_before_closeout | blocks_now33_candidate_consumption_guard\", \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"short string\", \"required_fixes\": [\"short string\"], \"scope_audit\": {\"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": \"boolean\", \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": \"boolean\", \"deepseek_advisory_only\": \"boolean\", \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": \"boolean\", \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": \"boolean\", \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": \"boolean\", \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": \"boolean\", \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": \"boolean\", \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": \"boolean\", \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": \"boolean\"}}, \"hard_boundaries\": {\"accepted_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"active_route_authority\": \"execution_state.json.next_entrypoint\", \"adapter_payload_allowed\": false, \"asset_binding_allowed\": false, \"asset_generation_or_acquisition_allowed\": false, \"candidate_consumption_guard_only\": true, \"candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings\": true, \"candidate_refs_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_entity_uid_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_uid_binding_acceptance_allowed\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_is_operator_production_acceptance\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_may_substitute_for_expert_advice\": true, \"deepseek_findings_have_direct_state_authority\": false, \"entity_store_writeback_allowed\": false, \"execution_state_next_entrypoint_unchanged\": true, \"feedback_intake_allowed\": false, \"held_row_promotion_allowed\": false, \"manual_provider_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"media_generation_allowed\": false, \"operator_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"operator_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"operator_production_acceptance_claimed\": false, \"outputs_index_mutation_allowed\": false, \"provider_job_execution_allowed\": false, \"provider_specific_prompt_allowed\": false, \"raw_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true, \"repair_execution_allowed\": false, \"replay_execution_allowed\": false, \"route_transition_allowed\": false, \"row_mutation_allowed\": false, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\"}, \"input_fingerprint\": \"1998593bbd61cf94518ffca4794580b5a3b0556f2c114657ef1276c39a48582d\", \"previous_round\": {\"dir\": \".\", \"parsed\": {}, \"record\": {}}, \"role\": \"DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max independent advisory reviewer. Advisory-only.\", \"round_id\": \"round1\", \"source_guard_packet\": {\"gate\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"block_reasons\": [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"], \"blocked_registry_leak_check\": {\"blocked_registry_entity_leak_count\": 0, \"candidate_uid_missing_from_registry_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings\": true, \"candidate_ref_count_check\": {\"actual_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gap_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gate_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"mismatches\": [], \"row_declared_count_mismatch_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_ref_structural_check\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"schema_normalization_notes\": [\"candidate refs used legacy surface field; output normalized it to matched_surface\"], \"status\": \"pass\", \"structural_missing_count\": 0}, \"candidate_refs_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_uid_binding_acceptance_or_writeback_authorized\": false, \"canonical_uid_writeback_check\": {\"candidate_refs_with_forbidden_ref_writeback\": 0, \"canonical_uid_rows\": [], \"gate_canonical_entity_uid_bound_count\": 0, \"manifest_rows_with_canonical_entity_uids\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"created_at\": \"2026-06-07T07:31:37.798260Z\", \"deepseek_advisory_status\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"failure_count\": 7, \"failures\": [\"implementation_deepseek_round1_parse_not_pass\", \"implementation_deepseek_round1_call_not_success\", \"implementation_deepseek_round1_not_supporting\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_parse_not_pass\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_call_not_success\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_not_supporting\", \"implementation_deepseek_round2_confidence_not_high\"], \"not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority\": true, \"round1\": {}, \"round2\": {}, \"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\"}, \"forbidden_side_effect_counts\": {\"accepted_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"adapter_payload_count\": 0, \"canonical_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"feedback_intake_count\": 0, \"manual_provider_evidence_count\": 0, \"media_generation_count\": 0, \"operator_evidence_creation_count\": 0, \"operator_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"outputs_index_mutation_count\": 0, \"provider_job_execution_count\": 0, \"provider_prompt_count\": 0, \"raw_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"repair_execution_count\": 0, \"replay_action_count\": 0}, \"gate_status\": \"pending_now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_implementation_deepseek_advisory\", \"input_integrity\": {\"checked_artifact_count\": 17, \"mismatch_count\": 0, \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_artifact_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"next_entrypoint_unchanged\": true, \"non_binding_flag_check\": {\"failure_count\": 0, \"failures\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority\": true, \"now33_macro_closeout_boundary\": \"not_closed\", \"output_forbidden_claim_scan\": {\"finding_count\": 0, \"findings\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"pass\": false, \"policy\": {\"accepted_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"active_route_authority\": \"execution_state.json.next_entrypoint\", \"adapter_payload_allowed\": false, \"asset_binding_allowed\": false, \"asset_generation_or_acquisition_allowed\": false, \"candidate_consumption_guard_only\": true, \"candidate_entity_refs_are_not_canonical_bindings\": true, \"candidate_refs_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_entity_uid_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"canonical_uid_binding_acceptance_allowed\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_is_operator_production_acceptance\": false, \"deepseek_advisory_may_substitute_for_expert_advice\": true, \"deepseek_findings_have_direct_state_authority\": false, \"entity_store_writeback_allowed\": false, \"execution_state_next_entrypoint_unchanged\": true, \"feedback_intake_allowed\": false, \"held_row_promotion_allowed\": false, \"manual_provider_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"media_generation_allowed\": false, \"operator_evidence_creation_allowed\": false, \"operator_overlay_writeback_allowed\": false, \"operator_production_acceptance_claimed\": false, \"outputs_index_mutation_allowed\": false, \"provider_job_execution_allowed\": false, \"provider_specific_prompt_allowed\": false, \"raw_kg_writeback_allowed\": false, \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true, \"repair_execution_allowed\": false, \"replay_execution_allowed\": false, \"route_transition_allowed\": false, \"row_mutation_allowed\": false, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\"}, \"registry_path_check\": {\"expected_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_required_path_keys\": [], \"observed_paths\": {\"now33_input_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"now33_registry_discovery_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"preflight_selected_candidate_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"target_registry_candidate\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\"}, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"review_queue_coverage\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"registry_content_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"status\": \"pass\", \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28}, \"source_fingerprint_check\": {\"inference_basis\": \"\", \"required_absent_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\", \"unique_nonempty_fingerprints\": [\"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"], \"values\": {\"built_candidate_preflight_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"now33_reference_rerun_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"selected_registry_payload\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"target_registry_build_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"}}, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\", \"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\", \"summary\": {\"accepted_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"adapter_payload_count\": 0, \"blocked_registry_entity_count\": 685, \"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"canonical_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"feedback_intake_count\": 0, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"manual_provider_evidence_count\": 0, \"media_generation_count\": 0, \"missing_high_value_surface_count\": 0, \"now33_manifest_row_count\": 1638, \"operator_evidence_creation_count\": 0, \"operator_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"output_forbidden_claim_finding_count\": 0, \"outputs_index_mutation_count\": 0, \"provider_job_execution_count\": 0, \"provider_prompt_count\": 0, \"raw_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"registry_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"repair_execution_count\": 0, \"replay_action_count\": 0, \"rows_with_candidate_refs\": 1056, \"surface_collision_count\": 0, \"target_registry_entity_count\": 713, \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28, \"validator_failure_count\": 1, \"validator_warning_count\": 1}, \"version\": \"now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.v1\", \"warnings\": [\"candidate_ref_surface_field_normalized_to_matched_surface\"]}, \"gate_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_gate.json\", \"sha256\": \"34df3e0fdad1a8024024d14a779c4a2989b72c648e78fb54be72eacea79da299\", \"size_bytes\": 8110}, \"guard_report_checks\": {\"blocked_registry_leak_check\": {\"blocked_registry_entity_leak_count\": 0, \"candidate_uid_missing_from_registry_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_ref_count_check\": {\"actual_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gap_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"gate_declared_candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"mismatches\": [], \"row_declared_count_mismatch_count\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"candidate_ref_structural_check\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"schema_normalization_notes\": [\"candidate refs used legacy surface field; output normalized it to matched_surface\"], \"status\": \"pass\", \"structural_missing_count\": 0}, \"canonical_uid_writeback_check\": {\"candidate_refs_with_forbidden_ref_writeback\": 0, \"canonical_uid_rows\": [], \"gate_canonical_entity_uid_bound_count\": 0, \"manifest_rows_with_canonical_entity_uids\": 0, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"input_integrity\": {\"checked_artifact_count\": 17, \"mismatch_count\": 0, \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_artifact_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"non_binding_flag_check\": {\"failure_count\": 0, \"failures\": [], \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"registry_path_check\": {\"expected_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"mismatches\": [], \"missing_required_path_keys\": [], \"observed_paths\": {\"now33_input_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"now33_registry_discovery_current_registry_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"preflight_selected_candidate_path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\", \"target_registry_candidate\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/target_source_grounded_entity_registry_build_20260607_0032/TARGET_REGISTRY_candidate_current_entity_registry.json\"}, \"status\": \"pass\"}, \"review_queue_coverage\": {\"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"registry_content_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"status\": \"pass\", \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28}, \"source_fingerprint_check\": {\"inference_basis\": \"\", \"required_absent_keys\": [], \"status\": \"pass\", \"unique_nonempty_fingerprints\": [\"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"], \"values\": {\"built_candidate_preflight_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"now33_reference_rerun_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"selected_registry_payload\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\", \"target_registry_build_gate\": \"c5d6ab4f5d8bc0aa4a018ebe6daec3315b0d646cb189b1a4fb28fe9a6e23ba34\"}}}, \"report_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_report.json\", \"sha256\": \"deb532e39a84301dc4d7760d824577d2326fb984133068953add6a83c282ac1d\", \"size_bytes\": 10888}, \"review_summary\": {\"advisory_only\": true, \"blocked_registry_entity_count\": 685, \"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"canonical_writeback_allowed\": false, \"created_at\": \"2026-06-07T07:31:37.744887Z\", \"missing_high_value_surface_count\": 0, \"not_evidence_or_acceptance_or_route_authority\": true, \"now33_manifest_row_count\": 1638, \"registry_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"risk_flag_counts\": {\"high_frequency_surface\": 1111, \"multiple_candidate_refs_in_row\": 799, \"object_or_location_surface\": 19, \"role_or_title_surface\": 194}, \"rows_with_candidate_refs\": 1056, \"stage\": \"NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review\", \"status\": \"review_packet_built\", \"surface_collision_count\": 0, \"target_registry_entity_count\": 713, \"top_surfaces\": [{\"count\": 418, \"surface\": \"宝玉\"}, {\"count\": 267, \"surface\": \"凤姐\"}, {\"count\": 120, \"surface\": \"黛玉\"}, {\"count\": 73, \"surface\": \"秦钟\"}, {\"count\": 66, \"surface\": \"贾政\"}, {\"count\": 55, \"surface\": \"宝钗\"}, {\"count\": 52, \"surface\": \"贾珍\"}, {\"count\": 52, \"surface\": \"刘姥姥\"}, {\"count\": 48, \"surface\": \"秦氏\"}, {\"count\": 47, \"surface\": \"尤氏\"}, {\"count\": 45, \"surface\": \"贾母\"}, {\"count\": 37, \"surface\": \"贾琏\"}, {\"count\": 35, \"surface\": \"平儿\"}, {\"count\": 30, \"surface\": \"贾雨村\"}, {\"count\": 18, \"surface\": \"李嬷嬷\"}, {\"count\": 17, \"surface\": \"封肃\"}, {\"count\": 16, \"surface\": \"薛姨妈\"}, {\"count\": 13, \"surface\": \"李贵\"}, {\"count\": 10, \"surface\": \"甄士隐\"}, {\"count\": 10, \"surface\": \"李纨\"}], \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28, \"version\": \"now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard.v1\"}, \"review_summary_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_review_summary.json\", \"sha256\": \"3318ae382ed239a8c7e01e4a1b2b0abdf2fd470a748520b7525b944b03b109bf\", \"size_bytes\": 2112}, \"source_guard_run_dir\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137\", \"validation_failures\": [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"], \"validation_ref\": {\"exists\": true, \"path\": \"/wwwb/aitools/writer/outputs/now33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_and_registry_content_review_20260607_153137/NOW_33_reference_candidate_consumption_guard_validation_report.json\", \"sha256\": \"01d3556e461fc003224356ee0f937b4a52a9e5b97824db5554d8969cb05b8d9f\", \"size_bytes\": 7799}, \"validation_summary\": {\"accepted_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"adapter_payload_count\": 0, \"blocked_registry_entity_count\": 685, \"candidate_ref_count\": 1476, \"candidate_ref_review_queue_rows\": 1476, \"canonical_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"feedback_intake_count\": 0, \"legacy_surface_normalization_count\": 1476, \"manual_provider_evidence_count\": 0, \"media_generation_count\": 0, \"missing_high_value_surface_count\": 0, \"now33_manifest_row_count\": 1638, \"operator_evidence_creation_count\": 0, \"operator_overlay_write_count\": 0, \"output_forbidden_claim_finding_count\": 0, \"outputs_index_mutation_count\": 0, \"provider_job_execution_count\": 0, \"provider_prompt_count\": 0, \"raw_kg_writeback_count\": 0, \"registry_review_queue_rows\": 28, \"repair_execution_count\": 0, \"replay_action_count\": 0, \"rows_with_candidate_refs\": 1056, \"surface_collision_count\": 0, \"target_registry_entity_count\": 713, \"unblocked_registry_entity_count\": 28, \"validator_failure_count\": 1, \"validator_warning_count\": 1}, \"validation_warnings\": [\"candidate_ref_surface_field_normalized_to_matched_surface\"]}, \"task\": \"Audit NOW-33 candidate consumption guard and registry-content review. Return JSON only.\"}"
    }
  ],
  "message_fingerprint": "932b0f86c7674e4fdf8f070ca245428248c2976ac94b2ee1fb84fe7f1eed084a",
  "response_text": "{\n  \"confidence\": \"high\",\n  \"findings\": [\n    {\n      \"category\": \"boundary\",\n      \"description\": \"All guard checks pass except pending DeepSeek advisory. Guard structure enforces advisory-only, no-writeback boundary.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"category\": \"validation\",\n      \"description\": \"Candidate ref surface normalization warning is acceptable per contract review-warning tolerance.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"category\": \"scope\",\n      \"description\": \"Final guard pass requires two successful DeepSeek rounds; only round 1 will be provided after this consultation. A future rerun cannot close without round 2.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"Record a successful DeepSeek Round 2 and rerun the guard with both successful rounds.\",\n      \"severity\": \"high\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\",\n  \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"NOW33_candidate_consumption_guard_ready_for_round2_then_closeout\",\n  \"required_fixes\": [\n    \"Complete and record DeepSeek Round 2 advisory with passing results\",\n    \"Rerun the consumption guard with both successful advisory rounds to obtain final pass\"\n  ],\n  \"scope_audit\": {\n    \"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": true,\n    \"deepseek_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": true,\n    \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": true,\n    \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": true,\n    \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": true,\n    \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true,\n    \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true,\n    \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": true\n  }\n}",
  "raw_response": {
    "id": "753ce5c2-a7f8-4df0-b693-8889606c90d2",
    "object": "chat.completion",
    "created": 1780817805,
    "model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
    "choices": [
      {
        "index": 0,
        "message": {
          "role": "assistant",
          "content": "{\n  \"confidence\": \"high\",\n  \"findings\": [\n    {\n      \"category\": \"boundary\",\n      \"description\": \"All guard checks pass except pending DeepSeek advisory. Guard structure enforces advisory-only, no-writeback boundary.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"category\": \"validation\",\n      \"description\": \"Candidate ref surface normalization warning is acceptable per contract review-warning tolerance.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"category\": \"scope\",\n      \"description\": \"Final guard pass requires two successful DeepSeek rounds; only round 1 will be provided after this consultation. A future rerun cannot close without round 2.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"Record a successful DeepSeek Round 2 and rerun the guard with both successful rounds.\",\n      \"severity\": \"high\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\",\n  \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"NOW33_candidate_consumption_guard_ready_for_round2_then_closeout\",\n  \"required_fixes\": [\n    \"Complete and record DeepSeek Round 2 advisory with passing results\",\n    \"Rerun the consumption guard with both successful advisory rounds to obtain final pass\"\n  ],\n  \"scope_audit\": {\n    \"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": true,\n    \"deepseek_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": true,\n    \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": true,\n    \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": true,\n    \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": true,\n    \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true,\n    \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true,\n    \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": true\n  }\n}",
          "reasoning_content": "We need to audit whether a future program rerun of the NOW-33 candidate consumption guard can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and supplied as implementation_deepseek_round1_dir, with candidate refs remaining advisory-only.\n\nThe input: the source guard packet indicates pending_deepseek_advisory, with failures from previous rounds. But the current consultation is round1 fresh. The consultation_process_boundary states: \"deepseek_must_audit_whether_a_future_program_rerun_with_these_records_can_close_no_writeback\": true, \"this_consultation_cannot_mutate_or_reclassify_the_source_guard_gate\": true, \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\": true.\n\nWe need to produce a JSON with findings and verdict according to expected_json_schema.\n\nImportant: The source guard packet's gate shows block_reasons: [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"], and deepseek_advisory_status has failures. However, we are now providing a round1 advisory. But we cannot directly change the gate. We can only audit whether with this record saved, a future rerun could close. The consultation_process_boundary says: \"this_consultation_record_must_be_written_first_then_passed_into_a_fresh_guard_rerun\".\n\nSo our role: examine the guard report, gate, reviews, and see if they satisfy the contract's consumption guard rules. Provide an advisory verdict. We are \"DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max independent advisory reviewer\". Our findings can influence whether a future rerun can close, but we do not directly close it.\n\nWe need to fill the scope_audit fields, and overall_verdict. The gate appears to have passed all checks except deepseek_advisory_status. The gate's own structure: \"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\", \"pass\": false, \"block_reasons\": [\"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\"]. So the only blocker is the missing successful deepseek advisory. The deepseek_advisory_status shows failures: round1 and round2 failed. If we now provide a successful round1, that could satisfy one of the two required successful implementation_deepseek_dirs. The contract says: \"Run two DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max advisory rounds over the contract and output packet if the implementation asserts closeout/readiness.\" and \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\": true. So perhaps the guard is programmed to require two successful rounds (each recorded in a separate directory). Our current round1 can become one such dir when recorded. Then a second round (round2) would be needed. Then a fresh rerun could pass.\n\nThus, our verdict might be that after this round1 advisory is recorded (as a valid supporting advisory), the guard would still need a second round and a fresh rerun. But the guard currently blocks because no successful deepseek advisories. After this round1 is recorded and supplied as implementation_deepseek_round1_dir, and assuming round2 also becomes successful, the future rerun could close as a no-writeback boundary. So we should check that all other checks are indeed passing, candidate refs remain advisory, no canonical writeback, etc. From the gate and reports, all checks pass: input_integrity pass, source_fingerprint pass, registry_path pass, candidate_ref_structural pass, candidate_ref_count pass, non_binding_flag pass, blocked_registry_leak pass, canonical_uid_writeback pass, output_forbidden_claim pass, review_queue_coverage pass, next_entrypoint_unchanged true, forbidden_side_effect_counts all zero. Warnings: one about surface normalization. That's acceptable per contract? The contract says: \"The guard may pass with review warnings if false-positive, missing-surface, alias-collision, or type-uncertainty risks are present, provided they are explicit review queue items and no forbidden writeback/acceptance authority is created.\" So warnings acceptable.\n\nThus, the only blocker is the missing deepseek advisory. If this round1 advisory is successfully recorded (i.e., it passes parsing, supports the guard, confidence high, etc.), then in a future rerun where that dir is passed as an input, the guard could potentially see that deepseek_advisory_status now has round1 success. But the gate currently hardcoded as \"pending_deepseek_advisory\"; in a fresh rerun, the guard implementation would re-read its inputs and perhaps evaluate if deepseek_advisory_status has two successful rounds. The contract says: \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\". That seems to be a rule for the guard's pass condition. The current gate's deepseek_advisory_status block reason \"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\" suggests the guard checks for at least one successful dir? Actually, the gate shows \"deepseek_advisory_status\": {\"status\": \"pending_deepseek_advisory\", \"round1\": {}, \"round2\": {}, \"failures\": ...}. So the guard evaluated that no successful round was provided. If we provide a successful round1 record, and the guard is run again with that round1 dir supplied (perhaps as a config input), then the guard could mark round1 as success and if round2 also success, then status could become \"pass\" (if all other checks pass). But the guard must be designed to require two successful rounds. The consultation_process_boundary confirms that: \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\". So our advisory is step one.\n\nThus, our audit should answer: Does the current state of the guard packet (excluding deepseek advisory) support a no-writeback closeout? Yes, all substantive checks pass. The advisory record will provide the missing deepseek step. But we need to ensure that our advisory itself is consistent: we must not claim to change the gate directly. Our output is advisory-only.\n\nNow the expected_json_schema requires fields like \"scope_audit\" with many booleans. Let's evaluate each.\n\nFrom the guard and contract:\n- candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only: true (gate and contract enforce this)\n- canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked: true (gate shows canonical_uid_writeback_check pass, no canonical uids, etc.)\n- deepseek_advisory_only: true (our role, and the guard's deepseek_advisory_status says \"advisory_only\": true)\n- fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass: true (as per boundary)\n- kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked: true (forbidden_side_effect_counts all zero)\n- now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable: this is specific. The gate has a \"source_fingerprint_check\" that passes with unique fingerprint. But the warning is about \"candidate_ref_surface_field_normalized_to_matched_surface\". That's not a missing fingerprint warning. The question: \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": probably refers to whether it's okay that the fingerprint is missing from some gates? Actually, the guard report passes fingerprint check. So it's not missing. But the field may be about a hypothetical warning if fingerprint missing; but since it's not missing, it's acceptable. We'll set to true. Or we can interpret as: \"if a fingerprint warning existed, would it be acceptable under contract?\". Since there is no such warning, it's acceptable. So true.\n\n- provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked: true (no evidence, no route change)\n- registry_content_review_packet_only: true (the guard only does review packets, no writebacks)\n- surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable: true (the guard's warning is about normalization of legacy surface to matched_surface, and the contract accepts review warnings. So it's acceptable.)\n- this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate: true (we are advisory only)\n\nFor overall_verdict: it should be something like \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\", because after two successful deepseek rounds, it can close. But since this is round1, we might say \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\" if any issues, but there are none. So the closest is \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\", perhaps with note that it requires the second round and a rerun. But the schema options: \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\" might imply that currently it can close, but actually it cannot close until two rounds are done. However, the verdict is about whether, given the records, the future rerun can close. Since the guard itself is pending deepseek, but if we provide a successful round1, then the only missing piece is round2 and the rerun. So we can say it supports closeout after fulfilling the remaining conditions. But the option \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout\" might be too strong. Let's check the options: \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_no_writeback_closeout | supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections | needs_fix_before_closeout | blocks_now33_candidate_consumption_guard\". The first implies it can close; but currently it cannot because of missing round2. However, the question: \"audit whether a future program rerun ... can close as a no-writeback boundary after this consultation is recorded and supplied as implementation_deepseek_round1_dir, with candidate refs remaining advisory-only.\" So the condition is after this consultation is recorded and supplied. But it still would need round2. But the consultation_process_boundary says \"final_guard_pass_requires_program_rerun_with_two_successful_implementation_deepseek_dirs\". So even after this round1, you'd need round2. So the future rerun with round1 dir alone would not close; it would still need round2. So does our audit say that after this consultation, the future rerun can close? Not yet; it would still be missing round2. But maybe the guard's rule for closing is that it requires two successful rounds. The current block reason is \"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\" which suggests that the guard is waiting for advisories. If we provide a successful round1, the guard might not be satisfied until round2 is also provided. So the answer is: after this consultation, a future rerun could close only if both rounds are provided and successful. But the question might be interpreted as: if we supply this round1 record, can the guard close (assuming the guard's logic will accept a single round)? But the contract explicitly says two rounds. So the guard's internal logic is to require two. The current source_guard_packet shows deepseek_advisory_status with round1 and round2 entries but failures. If we supply a successful round1, the guard would need to be configured to recognize that. In a fresh rerun, the guard implementation would presumably scan the provided deepseek dirs and assess success. If we only have one successful dir (round1), it might still fail because it expects two. But maybe the guard's rule is that it must have at least one successful round? Actually, the contract says: \"Run two DeepSeek v4 pro thinking/max advisory rounds over the contract and output packet if the implementation asserts closeout/readiness.\" So running two rounds is part of the procedure; the guard likely checks that both rounds have been run successfully. The gate currently reports failures for both, so status \"pending_deepseek_advisory\". If we fix round1, the gate (in future rerun) might still have round2 failure unless we also provide a successful round2. So strictly, after only round1, a future rerun cannot close. So overall_verdict might be \"needs_fix_before_closeout\" because it still needs round2. Or \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\" where the required corrections are providing a successful round2. I think \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\" fits: the required correction is to run and succeed round2 and then rerun. Alternatively, \"needs_fix_before_closeout\" also works. But \"blocks_now33_candidate_consumption_guard\" is too harsh because the fundamentals are fine.\n\nLet's see typical use in previous similar audits. The system likely expects that if we provide a successful round1 advisory, the guard's deepseek_status will have round1 marked success, and then we need round2. So the guard's block reason would change from \"implementation_deepseek_advisory_pending\" to something like \"implementation_deepseek_round2_pending\". But since the contract says two rounds, the closeout is not possible until both done. So our verdict should reflect that. I'll set overall_verdict to \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\" and required_fixes: [\"Complete successful DeepSeek v4 pro Round 2 advisory and rerun guard\"]. Or similar.\n\nNow confidence: high. We need to return JSON only.\n\nSo construct JSON:\n\n{\n  \"confidence\": \"high\",\n  \"findings\": [\n    {\n      \"category\": \"boundary\",\n      \"description\": \"All guard checks pass except pending DeepSeek advisory. Guard structure enforces advisory-only, no-writeback boundary.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"category\": \"validation\",\n      \"description\": \"Candidate ref surface normalization warning is acceptable per contract review-warning tolerance.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"none\",\n      \"severity\": \"low\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"category\": \"scope\",\n      \"description\": \"Final guard pass requires two successful DeepSeek rounds; only round 1 will be provided after this consultation. A future rerun cannot close without round 2.\",\n      \"required_fix\": \"Record a successful DeepSeek Round 2 and rerun the guard with both successful rounds.\",\n      \"severity\": \"high\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"overall_verdict\": \"supports_now33_candidate_consumption_guard_with_required_corrections\",\n  \"recommended_closeout_label\": \"NOW33_candidate_consumption_guard_ready_for_round2_then_closeout\",\n  \"required_fixes\": [\n    \"Complete and record DeepSeek Round 2 advisory with passing results\",\n    \"Rerun the consumption guard with both successful advisory rounds to obtain final pass\"\n  ],\n  \"scope_audit\": {\n    \"candidate_refs_remain_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"canonical_uid_binding_or_writeback_blocked\": true,\n    \"deepseek_advisory_only\": true,\n    \"fresh_program_rerun_required_for_final_pass\": true,\n    \"kg_raw_entity_store_overlay_row_mutation_blocked\": true,\n    \"now33_gate_missing_fingerprint_warning_acceptable\": true,\n    \"provider_manual_evidence_route_output_index_blocked\": true,\n    \"registry_content_review_packet_only\": true,\n    \"surface_to_matched_surface_normalization_acceptable\": true,\n    \"this_round_does_not_directly_mutate_source_guard_gate\": true\n  }\n}\n\nBut note: the finding severity for the missing round2 could be \"high\" or \"medium\". Since it's a required step, \"high\" is appropriate.\n\nAlso, the \"required_fix\" strings should be concise. The schema expects \"short string\". So we can use shorter descriptions.\n\nNow, ensure that the JSON is valid.\n\nWe'll output directly."
        },
        "logprobs": null,
        "finish_reason": "stop"
      }
    ],
    "usage": {
      "prompt_tokens": 9412,
      "completion_tokens": 3895,
      "total_tokens": 13307,
      "prompt_tokens_details": {
        "cached_tokens": 0
      },
      "completion_tokens_details": {
        "reasoning_tokens": 3422
      },
      "prompt_cache_hit_tokens": 0,
      "prompt_cache_miss_tokens": 9412
    },
    "system_fingerprint": "fp_9954b31ca7_prod0820_fp8_kvcache_20260402"
  },
  "raw_response_meta": {
    "id": "753ce5c2-a7f8-4df0-b693-8889606c90d2",
    "object": "chat.completion",
    "model": "deepseek-v4-pro",
    "usage": {
      "prompt_tokens": 9412,
      "completion_tokens": 3895,
      "total_tokens": 13307,
      "prompt_tokens_details": {
        "cached_tokens": 0
      },
      "completion_tokens_details": {
        "reasoning_tokens": 3422
      },
      "prompt_cache_hit_tokens": 0,
      "prompt_cache_miss_tokens": 9412
    },
    "finish_reason": "stop",
    "content_chars": 1842,
    "reasoning_content_present": true,
    "reasoning_content_chars": 15000
  }
}