{
  "confidence": "high",
  "final_recommendation": "land_after_corrections",
  "findings": [
    {
      "category": "control_plane",
      "description": "Round 1 correctly identifies the bootstrap gap—the validation failures are due to missing DeepSeek advisory artifacts (Round 1 and Round 2). Its recommendation to complete and attach both rounds and re‑run is accurate and does not over‑reach.",
      "required_fix": "none (Round 1 finding itself is correct)",
      "severity": "low"
    },
    {
      "category": "boundary",
      "description": "No hidden mutation authority, accepted‑status hallucination, or writeback overreach was detected in the sampled candidate, conflict, edit‑proposal, group, or registry‑prerequisite records. All proposals carry `proposed_no_writeback`, gate/validation zero‑count all forbidden side‑effects, and the system self‑declares no‑writeback/read‑only only.",
      "required_fix": "none",
      "severity": "low"
    },
    {
      "category": "control_plane",
      "description": "The edit‑first reconciliation lacks a drift check against the latest deferred‑UID candidate and registry queues. If the upstream queues are updated after the initial snapshot, the reconciliation may refer to stale records, leading to a mismatch when the operator later applies edits. The implementation does not appear to verify freshness or signal staleness.",
      "required_fix": "Add a drift‑detection step before finalising reconciliation: re‑hash the input queues and compare with the snapshot hashes; if they differ, either re‑snapshot or flag the reconciliation as stale and require a re‑run.",
      "severity": "medium"
    },
    {
      "category": "proposals",
      "description": "Proposal families (`alias_or_surface_update_candidate`, `split_or_merge_review_candidate`, `type_or_subtype_review_candidate`) are used as free‑form labels without a published schema or well‑defined state‑transition rules. This weakens downstream operator guidance and could cause inconsistent interpretation in later stages (e.g., actual registry mutation).",
      "required_fix": "Formalise an edit‑proposal taxonomy with clear semantics, allowed transitions, and example payloads; validate that all edit‑proposal records conform to this taxonomy before the reconciliation is considered landable.",
      "severity": "medium"
    }
  ],
  "hidden_registry_mutation_authority_detected": false,
  "parse_status": "pass",
  "proposal_acceptance_overreach_detected": false,
  "required_corrections": [
    "Complete and attach Round 1 and Round 2 DeepSeek advisory artifacts per Round 1’s own recommendation.",
    "Introduce a drift‑detection step that verifies input queue snapshot freshness before the reconciliation is considered final.",
    "Define and enforce a formal proposal taxonomy with documented semantics and validation."
  ],
  "round2_verdict": "round1_supported_with_corrections"
}